PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15584863

Hitting multiple targets with multimeric ligands.

Abstract

Multimeric ligands consist of multiple monomeric ligands attached to a single backbone molecule, creating a multimer that can bind to multiple receptors or targets simultaneously. Numerous examples of multimeric binding exist within nature. Due to the multiple and simultaneous binding events, multimeric ligands bind with an increased affinity compared to their corresponding monomers. Multimeric ligands may provide opportunities in the field of drug discovery by providing enhanced selectivity and affinity of binding interactions, thus providing molecular-based targeted therapies. However, gaps in our knowledge currently exist regarding the quantitative measures for important design characteristics, such as flexibility, length and orientation of the inter-ligand linkers, receptor density and ligand sequence. In this review, multimeric ligand binding in two separate phases is examined. The prerecruitment phase describes the binding of one ligand of a multimer to its corresponding receptor, an event similar to monomeric ligand binding. This results in transient increases in the local concentration of the other ligands, leading to apparent cooperativity. The postrecruitment phase only occurs once all receptors have been aligned and bound by their corresponding ligand. This phase is analogous to DNA-DNA interactions in that the stability of the complex is derived from physical orientation. Multiple factors influence the kinetics and thermodynamics of multimeric binding, and these are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Heather L Handl, Josef Vagner, Haiyong Han, Eugene Mash, Victor J Hruby, Robert J Gillies. 2004. Hitting multiple targets with multimeric ligands.. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.8.6.565

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Interferon alpha 2b treatment in an eleven-year-old boy with disseminated lymphangiomatosis.

Disseminated lymphangiomatosis is a rare disease mostly observed in children and young adults. If no surgical removal can be achieved, the prognosis is poor, especially for patients with thoracic localization and pleural effusions. Next to pleural drainage, therapeutic options include radiotherapy, local, and systemic pharmacotherapy. An 11-year-old boy presented with disseminated lymphangiomatosis involving thorax with massive pleural effusions, retroperitoneum, and bones. In immunohistochemical analysis, the tissue biopsy stained positive for vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor 3 (VEGFR-3). The patient has been treated with interferon alpha 2b for 2 years, and achieved a good clinical and radiological response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Cytotoxic assays for screening anticancer agents.

In the process of identifying potential anticancer agents, the ability of a new agent is tested for cytotoxic activity against a panel of standard cancer cell lines. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) present the cytotoxic profile for each agent as a set of estimates of the dose required to inhibit the growth of each cell line. The NCI estimates are obtained from a linear interpolation method applied to the dose-response curves. In this paper non-linear fits are proposed as an alternative to interpolation. This is illustrated with data from two agents recently submitted to NCI for potential anticancer activity. Fitting of individual non-linear curves proved difficult, but a non-linear mixed model applied to the full set of cell lines overcame most of the problems. Two non-linear functional forms were fitted using random effect models by both maximum likelihood and a full Bayesian approach. Model-based toxicity estimates have some advantages over those obtained from interpolation. They provide standard errors for toxicity estimates and other derived quantities, allow model comparisons. Examples of each are illustrated.

Antineoplastic Agents↗