PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 155986

Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratio.

Abstract

Left ventricular relative wall thickness, expressed as the ratio of end-diastolic radius to wall thickness (R/Th ratio), has a constant relation with left ventricular systolic pressure in children and adults with a normal heart, subjects with physiologic forms of cardiac hypertrophy (athletes) and patients with compensated chronic left ventricular volume overload (chronic aortic regurgitation). Greatly increased values for the radius/thickness ratio, suggesting inadequate hypertrophy, indicate a poor prognosis in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and in those with congestive cardiomyopathy; decreased values for this ratio are found in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (inappropriate hypertrophy) and in patients with compensated aortic stenosis (appropriate hypertrophy). In patients with compensated aortic stenosis, echocardiographic measurement of the left ventricular end-diastolic radius/wall thickness ratio has been used to estimate left ventricular systolic pressure. Measurement of left ventricular relative wall thickness appears to provide diagnostic and prognostic data in patients with a broad variety of cardiac disorders.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W H Gaasch. 1979. Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratio.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(79)90152-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report is the prospective, multicentre evaluation of clinical results and haemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis. METHODS: From April 2001 to June 2003, 166 patients (male:female 125:41; mean (SD) age 61.8 (11.8) years) received an aortic advantage valve prosthesis. Complete cumulative follow-up was 242.7 patient-years (maximum 3.2; mean 1.6 years). Postoperatively, patients underwent early (within 30 days) and 1 year transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: 30 day mortality was 2.4% (n = 4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from complications and linearised rates were as follows: 96.9 (1.6)% survival; 94.7 (1.3)% (2.06 patients/year) thrombo-embolism; 99.4 (0.6)% (0.4 patients/year) bleeding; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) non-structural valve dysfunction; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) reoperation. Valvular mean pressure gradients ranged from 16 (3) mm Hg for size 19 to 7 (2) mm Hg for size 27 and the corresponding effective orifice areas ranged from 1.2 (0.25) to 3.2 (0.66) cm(2). In all, left ventricular mass significantly decreased (p<0.001) and fractional shortening increased (p<0.001) from postoperative to 1 year echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic performance and early clinical results of Medtronic advantage in the aortic position were satisfactory and comparable with those of other bileaflet valves in current clinical use.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗

Aortic insufficiency due to a partial left-coronary aortic valve prolapse and the detection of two small interatrial jets after blunt thoracic trauma.

Aortic valve regurgitation due to blunt thoracic trauma is a rare complication. Autopsy studies have been shown that the aortic valve is the most often lacerated one among the heart valves. Actually, we describe a case of a 47 year old man with the signs of heart failure after a blunt thoracic trauma 2 months before caused by aortic insufficiency due to a partial left-coronary aortic valve prolapse. Furthermore, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed two small jets between the left and the right atrium.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗