PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15608252

FESD: a Functional Element SNPs Database in human.

Hyo Jin Kang·Kyoung Oak Choi·Byung-Dong Kim·Sangsoo Kim·Young Joo Kim
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have created the Functional Element SNPs Database (FESD) that categorizes functional elements in human genic regions and provides a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located within each area. In the FESD, the human genic regions were divided into 10 different functional elements, such as promoter regions, CpG islands, 5'-untranslated regions (5'-UTRs), translation start sites, splice sites, coding exons, introns, translation stop sites, polyadenylation signals and 3'-UTRs, and subsequently, all the known SNPs were assigned to each functional element at their respective position. With the FESD web interface, users can select a set of SNPs in the specific functional elements and get their flanking sequences for genotyping experiments, which will help in finding mutations that contribute to the common and polygenic diseases. A web interface for the FESD is freely available at http://combio.kribb.re.kr/ksnp/resd/.

Explore related subjects

Databases, Nucleic AcidGene ComponentsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanHaplotypesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUser-Computer InterfaceJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hyo Jin Kang, Kyoung Oak Choi, Byung-Dong Kim, Sangsoo Kim, Young Joo Kim. 2005-01-01. FESD: a Functional Element SNPs Database in human.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2Fgki082

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The INSDC specifications-foundations for a FAIR and global INSDC.

Members of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC; https://www.insdc.org/) collect, exchange, and preserve comprehensive open nucleotide sequence information and provide tools for its access. The INSDC has stated its commitment to welcoming new members into the collaboration to be more representative of the global community of data and users. To reach this goal, a comprehensive definition of the INSDC data model and minimum requirements for data acceptance have been established. Here we describe the processes used to arrive upon these INSDC Specifications and lay out strategies for their continued upkeep to remain current and relevant. Database URL:  https://www.insdc.org/.

Databases, Nucleic Acid↗
PubMed2006

The value of gene-based selection of tag SNPs in genome-wide association studies.

Genome-wide association scans are rapidly becoming reality, but there is no present consensus regarding genotyping strategies to optimise the discovery of true genetic risk factors. For a given investment in genotyping, should tag SNPs be selected in a gene-centric manner, or instead, should coverage be optimised based on linkage disequilibrium alone? We explored this question using empirical data from the HapMap-ENCODE project, and we found that tags designed specifically to capture common variation in exonic and evolutionarily conserved regions provide good coverage for 15-30% of the total common variation (depending on the population sample studied), and yield genotype savings compared with an anonymous tagging approach that captures all common variation. However, the same number of tags based on linkage disequilibrium alone captures substantially more (30-46%) of the total common variation. Therefore, the best strategy depends crucially on the unknown degree to which functional variation resides in recognisable exons and evolutionarily conserved sequence. A hypothetical but reasonable scenario might be one in which trait-causing variation is equally distributed between exons plus conserved sequence, and the rest of the genome. In this scenario, our analysis suggests that a tagging approach that captures variation in exons and conserved sequence provides only modestly better coverage of putatively causal variation than does anonymous tagging. In HapMap CEU samples (with northern and western European ancestry), we observed roughly equivalent coverage for equal investment for both tagging strategies.

Databases, Nucleic Acid↗
PubMed2006

Identical probes on different high-density oligonucleotide microarrays can produce different measurements of gene expression.

BACKGROUND: There are many potential sources of variability in a microarray experiment. Variation can arise from many aspects of the collection and processing of samples for gene expression analysis. Oligonucleotide-based arrays are thought to minimize one source of variability as identical oligonucleotides are expected to recognize the same transcripts during hybridization. RESULTS: We demonstrate that although the probes on the U133A GeneChip arrays are identical in sequence to probes designed for the U133 Plus 2.0 arrays the values obtained from an experimental hybridization can be quite different. Nearly half of the probesets in common between the two array types can produce slightly different values from the same sample. Nearly 70% of the individual probes in these probesets produced array specific differences. CONCLUSION: The context of the probe may also contribute some bias to the final measured value of gene expression. At a minimum, this should add an extra level of caution when considering the direct comparison of experiments performed in two microarray formats. More importantly, this suggests that it may not be possible to know which value is the most accurate representation of a biological sample when comparing two formats.

Databases, Nucleic Acid↗