PubMed · 15610465
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I C Roberts-Thomson, W J Butler. 2005. Polymorphism and ulcerative colitis.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03756.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Laparoscopic surgery has recently been gaining acceptance as an alternative approach for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. There is increasing evidence demonstrating the multiple potential benefits of laparoscopy including faster recovery, reduced costs, and lower morbidity. For patients with acute colitis, a laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and end ileostomy have been shown to be feasible and safe in experienced hands. When indicated, many of these patients may be able to safely undergo a subsequent laparoscopic approach for construction of an ileo-anal pouch. Although still controversial, an elective laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis has also been shown to be feasible with functional outcomes at least similar to those obtained with an open approach. However, larger randomized series of patients are needed with longer follow-up in order to draw definite conclusions. For Crohn's disease, a laparoscopic approach is ideal for stoma creation. In addition, laparoscopic ileo-colectomy is arguably the preferred approach for patients with terminal ileal disease. Some experienced laparoscopic groups have also applied laparoscopic techniques for more complicated cases with recurrent disease or disease-related complications, such as fistulous disease. Other short-term benefits of a laparoscopic approach may include a decreased incidence of ventral hernias, decreased incidence of small bowel obstruction, and faster recovery. These benefits may also have significant economic impact. In contrast to earlier reports, there is reliable evidence that conversion is not associated with a poorer outcome. A policy of starting most suitable cases laparoscopically may offer patients the potential benefits of a laparoscopic approach without increasing morbidity.
BACKGROUND: Patients with M. Crohn or colitis ulcerosa live with a chronic disease. Pharmaceuticals used in convention-al medicine have been proven to be effective but can have strong side-effects. Thus, it is no surprise that affected patients are very interested in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). OBJECTIVE: The aim of our survey was to investigate the use and the application of CAM by patients with M. Crohn and colitis ulcerosa in Switzerland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out-patients of the gastroenterological centre at the University Hospital Bern and of two gastroenterological private practices in a medium-sized city completed a self-administered questionnaire on CAM. Demographic variables, disease-related data, use of different approaches of complementary medicine, attitudes towards and the use of CAM were asked for. RESULTS: Out of 204 mailed questionnaires 71% (144) could be evaluated, 44% from patients of the University Hospital, 56% from patients of the gastroenterological private practices. CAM was used by 47% of the patients. The most commonly used methods of CAM were: homeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture. 67% of the patients benefitted by CAM in the long run, whereas 10.5% suffered a relapse of their disease during CAM therapies. The main reason for the patients to apply to CAM was to complement conventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Our survey points out that the studied out-patients have a strong interest in CAM. It is therefore important that clinical research in the various unconventional therapies will be further promoted.
To propose a new pathogenesis called Radical Induction to explain the genesis and progression of ulcerative colitis (UC). UC is an inflammatory bowel disease. Colonic inflammation in UC is mediated by a buildup of white blood cells (WBCs) within the colonic mucosal lining; however, to date there is no answer for why WBCs initially enter the colonic mucosa to begin with. A new pathogenesis termed "Radical Induction Theory" is proposed to explain this and states that excess un-neutralized hydrogen peroxide, produced within colonic epithelial cells as a result of aberrant cellular metabolism, diffuses through cell membranes to the extracellular space where it is converted to the highly damaging hydroxyl radical resulting in oxidative damage to structures comprising the colonic epithelial barrier. Once damaged, the barrier is unable to exclude highly immunogenic fecal bacterial antigens from invading the normally sterile submucosa. This antigenic exposure provokes an initial immune response of WBC infiltration into the colonic mucosa. Once present in the mucosa, WBCs are stimulated to secrete toxins by direct exposure to fecal bacteria leading to mucosal ulceration and bloody diarrhea characteristic of this disease.