PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15611786

Obsessive-compulsive disorder phenotypes: implications for genetic studies.

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) clinical presentation is remarkably diverse, and can vary both within and across patients over time. This variability in the phenotypic expression has led to the hypothesis that OCD is a heterogeneous disorder and that this heterogeneity obscures the findings of clinical, natural history and treatment response studies and complicates the search for vulnerability genes. A complete understanding of what comprises OCD and the underlying etiological mechanisms will require a dramatic change in how the disorder is conceptualized. In this review, several different approaches that may represent the first steps in this reconceptualization are discussed. These approaches include (1) narrowing the phenotype to identify categorically defined more homogeneous and mutually exclusive subtypes of OCD, (2) considering OC symptom dimensions as quantitative components of the more complex OCD phenotype and (3) broadening the phenotype to include other etiologically related conditions. A combined dimensional approach within distinctive subgroups is proposed as probably the most effective in helping to identify the heritable components of OCD. By identifying heritable components of OCD, it should be possible to find genes for these separate components. The review continues with the illustration of the possible role of some epigenetic risk and protective factors in the OCD presentation and the relevance of examining associated traits and/or endophenotypes to enhance our ability to understand the genetic basis of OCD. To conclude, we discuss the variability in treatment outcome and the significance of the development of specific pharmacological and/or behavioral based therapies tailored to each of these phenotypes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E C Miguel, J F Leckman, S Rauch, M C do Rosario-Campos, A G Hounie, M T Mercadante, P Chacon, D L Pauls. 2005. Obsessive-compulsive disorder phenotypes: implications for genetic studies.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001617

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Biomolecular Condensates Integrate Transcriptional and Epigenetic Responses to Hypoxia.

Hypoxia is a defining feature of physiological stress and the core of solid tumors, where aberrant vascularization limits oxygen delivery; cells respond through mechanisms that extend beyond the canonical stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). Recent studies suggest that hypoxia can promote the formation of specific biomolecular conden-sates, membraneless compartments generated through liquid-liquid phase separation in which regulatory proteins and RNAs become locally enriched at genomic regions, while chromatin mainly serves as an organizational scaffold. Transcription factors, the coacti-vators p300/CBP, Mediator, and BRD4, chromatin-modifying enzymes, and architectural RNAs such as NEAT1 and MALAT1 partition into these compartments, and their con-densation can help reorganize local chromatin structure and enhancer-promoter interac-tions. Because molecular oxygen is a shared co-substrate for the Jumonji-C histone demethylases and the ten-eleven translocation (TET) DNA dioxygenases, hypoxia reshapes histone methylation and DNA methylation in parallel, and readers that bridge these marks, including UHRF1, may participate in condensate-associated chromatin regulation. Hypoxia-driven condensation of ZHX2 rewires enhancer-promoter contacts and higher-order genome architecture, influencing cell identity, stemness, and metastatic potential, and Polycomb condensates represent another candidate epigenetic compartment that may be influenced by hypoxic signaling. These processes may be particularly important in cancer, where chronic hypoxia provides a sustained stimulus for condensate formation and epigenetic remodeling. Together, these findings support a model in which phase separation and epigenetic reprogramming are not separate layers but one integrated response to low oxygen, offering opportunities to target maladaptive condensates in disease.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗

Zone equalisation normalisation for improved alignment of epigenetic signal.

MOTIVATION: High-throughput genomic technologies have transformed our understanding of biological systems, yet direct comparison and visualisation of these complex datasets remains challenging. Existing normalisation methods often fail to align genomic signal across samples due to sensitivity to sequencing depth differences and localised high-signal artefacts, leading to inconsistent replicate behaviour and increased downstream variability. RESULTS: We introduce Zone Equalisation Normalisation (ZEN), a novel approach designed to improve cross-sample signal alignment of genomic data. ZEN rescales genomic signal based on variance estimated within biologically enriched regions, reducing the influence of extreme outliers while preserving underlying biological structure. Using a diverse collection of data and our new genome-wide benchmarking approach, we reveal that ZEN improves biological and technical replicate alignment across the majority of tested conditions and experimental platforms. We further show that this improved signal comparability is associated with fewer differential accessibility calls between technical replicates and a more conservative set of biological differences. Together, these results demonstrate that ZEN provides a complementary framework to improve the accuracy and reliability of genomic data analysis and that normalisation choice can affect downstream analyses and biological interpretation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ZEN is available as an open-source Python package via conda and PyPI. Source code, documentation, tutorials, and code to reproduce the analyses are available at https://github.com/Genome-Function-Initiative-Oxford/Zone-Equalisation-Normalisation and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21067751).

Epigenesis, Genetic↗

Epigenetic regulation of kidney development.

The methylation or demethylation of genomic DNA at specific locations and the diverse array of post-translational modifications of histones associated with genomic DNA are collectively known as epigenetic modifications, so-called because they affect chromatin structure but do not affect the actual DNA sequence of the genome. Nevertheless, post-translational modifications of histones, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination, as well as the methylation and subsequent de-methylation of genomic DNA, can profoundly affect gene expression. Nowhere has the study of epigenetically regulated gene expression had such impact as on our understanding of organism development. In the developing kidney, epigenetic-based regulation affects the cell fate decisions of stem-like nephron progenitor cells (NPCs). Changes in chromatin accessibility at the loci of genes associated with NPC self-renewal and nephron differentiation - in part driven by transcription factors known to regulate kidney development - affect the differentiation of NPCs into precursors of the nephron such as the pretubular aggregate and renal vesicle, and the subsequent differentiation of various segments of the mature nephron. Epigenetic mechanisms also contribute to the process of NPC ageing and the cessation of nephrogenesis, with consequences for nephron endowment and kidney function.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗