PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15615097

Portable/transport ventilators.

Abstract

Portable ventilators are often used with patients who require long-term breathing support. Current-generation models are compact and lightweight and offer some of the same features that once were available only on costly intensive care ventilators. As technological advances continue to prolong life for critically ill patients and make life possible for both children and adults with otherwise fatal conditions, portable ventilators are helping to make these patients more comfortable and more mobile. They ease the transport of patients within the hospital, and they allow some difficult-to-ventilate patients, especially infants, to receive ventilation at home. In this article, we evaluate three portable/transport ventilators from three suppliers, rating them separately for (1) home care and long-term care applications and (2) in-hospital transport applications. Our ratings place special emphasis on ventilator performance, alarm effectiveness, ease of use, and portability. We found that all the units provide at least satisfactory ventilation, but that their other characteristics vary considerably. For home care and long-term care, we rate two units Acceptable--but one of them is suitable for use only if certain steps related to its alarm volume are taken. The third unit is Not Recommended because of significant drawbacks associated with its ease of use, alarms, and portability. For in-hospital transport, we rate one unit Preferred because it has many features beneficial for transporting critically ill patients. A second unit is Acceptable, while the third is Not Recommended, again because of its many drawbacks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2004. Portable/transport ventilators.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15615097/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample.

In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function.

Ambulatory Care↗

How normalised is HIV care in the UK? A survey of current practice and opinion.

OBJECTIVES: The prognosis for individuals infected with HIV has changed dramatically over the past 10 years, with patients living longer and requiring other specialist services. It is apparent that access of other healthcare professionals to clinical information about a patient's HIV care differs between centres in the UK. Lack of awareness of an individual's HIV status may compromise their clinical care. AIM: To establish current practice and identify the views of clinicians caring for patients infected with HIV. METHODS: Lead consultants in all genitourinary medicine departments in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding use of combined HIV and hospital notes and ability of general practitioners and other hospital specialists to access information about individual patient's HIV care. Clinician's opinions on the "normalisation" of HIV management were also sought. RESULTS: Combined notes (outpatient and inpatient) were used by 12% (16/130) of respondents. The patient's identifying number was used to request blood tests in 86%. Of the respondents, 42% had encountered difficulties in communication that affected delivery of care for an HIV-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: Centres using combined notes identified a higher frequency of communication with other doctors and specialties, suggesting a higher standard of care. Physicians involved in HIV care should consider combining patients' HIV and hospital notes for improved clinical care.

Ambulatory Care↗