PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1561543

Partnership in dignity.

Abstract

The individual with a spinal cord injury lives in double jeopardy. The patient's mental outlook toward disability resulting from an SCI is affected by his/her age at onset and premorbid personality. This, in turn, will affect his/her own attitude toward maintaining an active lifestyle and living a "normal" life. The nurse is the individual's first exposure to "what people think." The nurse's knowledge of what it takes to successfully adapt and their familiarity with the real world of disability is essential. This "first exposure" determines whether one views oneself as "sick" or changed. Spinal cord injury nurses must learn the difference between facility independence and functional living if they are to ever truly assist in normalizing their clients and preventing a lifetime of illness and physical deterioration. This normalization is essential if clients are going to live a full, productive life. Spinal cord injury does not have to be synonymous with chronic illness. Spinal cord injury is not an illness, but rather an altered means of physical mobility and functioning. This article explores the concept of partnership between SCI nurses and their clients. This partnership is further discussed regarding its relationship to the impact it has upon returning control to the spinal cord injured individual and assisting him/her with experiencing opportunities to increase the return of dignity and self-worth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Theuerkauf, A Stewart. 1992. Partnership in dignity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1561543/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗