PubMed · 15617945
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sandra M Brown. 2004. Measuring starbursts.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.041
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Astigmatism is commonly reported in children with and without nystagmus. In children less than 4 years of age the astigmatism changes from against the rule (ATR) to with the rule (WTR) astigmatism in children without nystagmus. However, little is known about children with congenital nystagmus. We compared astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus below 4 years and above 4 years of age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-six eyes in 178 children who satisfied the study criteria were included. The children were divided into those below 4 years of age (n of eyes = 192) and those above (n of eyes = 164). Cycloplegic refraction (with manual retinoscopy) carried out at presentation and at the last follow-up were recorded and compared. Cycloplegia was achieved using cyclopentolate eye drops. Outcome of eyes with no astigmatism at initial presentation was compared with the final refraction in both the age groups. The visual acuity at the first presentation was compared with the visual acuity at the last presentation. RESULTS: Average follow-up duration was 3.36+/-1.59 years. On presentation, 176 (49.44%) eyes did not have any astigmatism. We found that 26 (25.2%) out of the 103 children below 4 years of age who did not have any astigmatism on presentation developed WTR astigmatism after a mean follow-up of 3.5+/-1.5 years. (p= 0.042). In children >or=4 years of age only 7 (9.6%) children out of 73 developed WTR after a mean follow-up of 3.4+/-1.4 years. The visual acuity change was not found to be significant in the two groups. The majority (90.3%) improved or had same visual acuity in group A and 88.9% improved or had the same visual acuity in group B at the last follow-up (p= 0.77). DISCUSSION: Our incidence of WTR astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus is similar to those previously reported series. Our data suggest that there is a significant chance that children under 4 years with congenital nystagmus may develop WTR astigmatism compared with children above 4 years of age. CONCLUSION: With the rule (WTR) astigmatism is common in children with nystagmus. Children under 4 years of age presenting with no astigmatism may acquire WTR astigmatism as they grow. The amount of astigmatism increases with age in children with nystagmus. Visual acuity, however, remains stable as the age advances.
Abnormal head position is a compensatory condition which improves patients' vision. It can be caused by ophthalmological problems such as oculomotor imbalances (strabismus, nystagmus) and high astigmatism. However, it results in esthetic impairment, orthopedic trouble and facial asymmetries. We describe a case of a girl, JL, 8 years, with abnormal head position tilted to the left since the last glasses were prescribed. The correction used by the patient was: right eye = +2.00 sph diopter -5.5 cyl 180 degrees and left eye = +2.25 sph diopter -5.75 cyl 180 degrees. In tilted position, the correct visual acuity was: right eye 6/12 and left eye 6/9. No deviations were noted by the cover test and the remaining ophthalmological examination was completely normal. Retinoscopy under cycloplegia and subjective test showed right eye = +3.50 sph diopter -6.00 cyl 10 degrees; and left eye = +3.50 sph diopter -6.00 cyl 170 degrees, with visual acuity 6/6 in both eyes. With adequate prescription, the head position was normalized. Wrong cylindrical positions for correction of high astigmatism may cause abnormal head position. Retinoscopy under cycloplegia and subjective test are essential for precise diagnoses and prescriptions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.