PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15619190

Pectus excavatum.

Charles B Huddleston
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the more common chest wall anomalies seen in children is pectus excavatum. Although some studies suggest a physiologic impact of this anomaly on cardiac function during exercise, this remains somewhat controversial. Regardless, a number of children are symptomatic from either the appearance of the deformity or from the standpoint of tolerance to exercise. Most are relieved of these symptoms with surgical repair. Several different operations have been utilized for repair of this anomaly, but two techniques now are the predominant methods in use today. These are the modified Ravitch procedure and the Nuss procedure. Both have been shown to provide satisfactory results.

Explore related subjects

Funnel ChestHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansThoracic Surgical ProceduresThoraxJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Charles B Huddleston. 2004. Pectus excavatum.. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2004.08.003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Infectious complications after the Nuss repair in a series of 863 patients.

PURPOSE: A nemesis of surgical implants is infection. We evaluated the various infectious complications after Nuss repair of pectus excavatum in 863 patients over 18 years. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered database of patients was performed who underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and developed an infection. All patients received intravenous antibiotics before surgery continuing until discharge. Patients with a persistent fever after operation were discharged with oral antibiotics. RESULTS: From January 1987 to September 2005, 863 patients underwent a minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair and 13 (1.5%) developed postoperative infections. These included 6 bar infections, 4 cases of cellulitis, and 3 stitch abscesses. Cellulitis was defined as erythema and warmth which responded to a single course of antibiotics. Bar infections were defined as an abscess in contact with the bar. Surgical drainage and long-term antibiotics resolved 3 of these abscesses, whereas 3 patients required early bar removal (1 after 3 months and 2 after 18 months). Cultures identified a single organism in each case and Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism (83%) identified, and all being methicillin sensitive. All infections occurred on the side of the stabilizer if a stabilizer had been placed. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious complications after Nuss repair are uncommon and occurred in 1.5% of our patients. Published rates of postoperative infection range from 1.0% to 6.8%. Superficial infections responded to antibiotics alone. Bar infection occurred in only 0.7% and required surgical drainage and long-term antibiotics. Only 3 of these (50% of bar infections and 0.34% overall) required early bar removal at 3 and 18 months because of recurring infections. Early bar removal should be a rare morbidity with the Nuss repair.

Funnel Chest↗