PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15621473

Borderline left ventricle.

Abstract

The first problem to solve when dealing with the topic 'borderline left ventricle' is to find the appropriate definition. Several parameters have been taken into consideration, either morphometric (diameter of the mitral valve, indexed mitral valve area, left ventricular inflow dimension, left ventricular cross-sectional area, ratio between the apex-to-base left ventricular dimension and right ventricular dimension, left ventricular long axis to heart long axis ratio, left ventricular end diastolic volume, left ventricular mass index, ratio of the right/left ventricular wall thickness, presence of endocardial fibroelastosis, cardiac apex not formed by the left ventricle, diameter of the ventriculo-aortic junction, diameter of the aortic valve annulus and indexed aortic root diameter) as well as functional (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, direction of the blood flow in the ascending aorta and at the level of the patent ductus arteriosus). Pre-operative determination whether the left ventricle is adequate to sustain the systemic circulation, or it may became adequate with the available surgical approaches, and therefore a bi-ventricular type of repair is feasible, can be extremely difficult, particularly in the presence of a 'borderline left ventricle'. In the clinical practice pediatric cardiologists and cardiac surgeons are faced with the problem of the 'borderline left ventricle' in four different groups of congenital heart defects: (a) aortic valve stenosis, (b) aortic coarctation, with or without hypoplastic aortic arch, (c) hypoplastic left heart complex, (d) right ventricular pressure and/or volume overload. In all the above situations in the presence of a left ventricle smaller than normal a very exhaustive approach has been reviewed in the decision making process, taking in account the literature reports as well as the personal experience. In each patient with 'borderline left ventricle' the elements to be considered for the decision making process between uni- and bi-ventricular type of repair, or for less ideal options of management, are the following: morphometric and functional parameters, hemodynamic data, available surgical options, results of the personal and institutional experience.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antonio F Corno. 2005. Borderline left ventricle.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.10.034

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hydatid cyst involving the aortic arch.

We report a very rare case of primary mediastinal hydatid cyst which invaded the ascending aorta and the aortic arch which initially presented as a cranial mass. Aortic wall is a very unusual site for the hydatid cysts. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of hydatid cyst located within the aortic arch lumen. Patient underwent ascending aortic and hemiarch replacement under hypothermic circulatory arrest and removal of the cyst. Patient had an uneventful recovery and has been on follow-up. Although the literature data are very limited, we believe that the aortic procedure of choice should be graft interpositon rather than patch repair.

Aorta, Thoracic↗

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of persistent fifth aortic arch in children.

BACKGROUND: Cine angiography and echocardiography have been utilized to diagnose congenital aortic arch anomalies. However, the visualization of great vessels by echocardiography is limited, while cine angiography requires cardiac catheterization with ionizing radiation. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive modality suitable for visualization of congenital aortic arch anomalies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced MRA in the diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch, a rare congenital aortic arch anomaly, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRA with that of echocardiography and cine angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In four pediatric patients, contrast-enhanced MRA studies were performed for diagnosing persistent fifth aortic arch. The findings of MRA were compared with echocardiographic findings and confirmed by cine angiography and operation. RESULTS: Transthoracic surface echocardiography noted an aberrant vessel arising from the ascending aorta in two of four patients; the etiology of this vessel was uncertain. In the other two patients a diagnosis of coarctation was made. Of the four patients, only one was diagnosed with interruption of the aortic arch. Contrast-enhanced MRA clarified uncertain echocardiographic findings, enabling the correct diagnosis of persistent fifth aortic arch with fourth aortic arch interruption in all four patients. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MRA is a safe, accurate, and fast imaging technique for the evaluation of persistent fifth aortic arch and may obviate the need for conventional cine angiography. Cardiac catheterization may be reserved for some types of complicated congenital heart disease and for obtaining hemodynamic information.

Aorta, Thoracic↗

Antenatal Doppler measurements and early brain injury in very low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between fetoplacental blood flow and brain injury and volumes in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN: Antenatal blood flow from the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and descending aorta was determined in 70 VLBW infants. The directions of the total diastolic flow of the aortic isthmus and the end-diastolic flow of ductus venosus also were measured. Serial brain ultrasound examinations and MRI at term were performed to assess brain abnormalities. On the basis of brain imaging findings, the newborn infants were classified as normal (n = 14), intermediate brain pathology (n = 31), and major pathology (n = 25) groups. RESULTS: Abnormalities in fetoplacental blood flow were not related to anatomic brain lesions. However, an abnormal UA/MCA pulsatility index ratio was associated with reduced total brain volume (mean, 360 mL; SD, 32.5 mL) and reduced cerebral volume (344 mL; SD, 28.4 mL) compared with infants with normal UA/MCA pulsatility index ratio (mean, 405 mL; SD, 51.3 mL, P = .01, and mean, 368 mL; SD, 52.3 mL, P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Redistribution of fetal blood flow in VLBW infants is associated with reduced brain volume at term age. Neurodevelopmental follow-up of this cohort will clarify the significance of these blood flow changes on development.

Aorta, Thoracic↗