PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15624062

Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

A J Duffy·N J Hogle·H McCarthy·J I Lew·A Egan·P Christos·D L Fowler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skills required for laparoscopic surgery are amenable to simulator-based training. Several computerized devices are now available. We hypothesized that the LAPSIM simulator can be shown to distinguish novice from experienced laparoscopic surgeons, thus establishing construct validity. METHODS: We tested residents of all levels and attending laparoscopic surgeons. The subjects were tested on eight software modules. Pass/fail (P/F), time (T), maximum level achieved (MLA), tissue damage (TD), motion, and error scores were compared using the t-test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 54 subjects were tested. The most significant difference was found when we compared the most (seven attending surgeons) and least experienced (10 interns) subjects. Grasping showed significance at P/F and MLA (p < 0.03). Clip applying was significant for P/F, MLA, motion, and errors (p < 0.02). Laparoscopic suturing was significant for P/F, MLA, T, TD, as was knot error (p < 0.05). This finding held for novice, intermediate, and expert subjects (p < 0.05) and for suturing time between attending surgeons and residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-4) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LAPSIM has construct validity to distinguish between expert and novice laparoscopists. Suture simulation can be used to discriminate between individuals at different levels of residency and expert surgeons.

Explore related subjects

Clinical CompetenceComputer SimulationInternship and ResidencyLaparoscopyComparative StudyJournal ArticleValidation Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Duffy, N J Hogle, H McCarthy, J I Lew, A Egan, P Christos, D L Fowler. 2004-12-23. Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8202-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Evolution of surgical skills training.

Surgical training is changing: one hundred years of tradition is being challenged by legal and ethical concerns for patient safety, work hours restrictions, the cost of operating room time, and complications. Surgical simulation and skills training offers an opportunity to teach and practice advanced skills outside of the operating room environment before attempting them on living patients. Simulation training can be as straight forward as using real instruments and video equipment to manipulate simulated "tissue" in a box trainer. More advanced, virtual reality simulators are now available and ready for widespread use. Early systems have demonstrated their effectiveness and discriminative ability. Newer systems enable the development of comprehensive curricula and full procedural simulations. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) has mandated the development of novel methods of training and evaluation. Surgical organizations are calling for methods to ensure the maintenance of skills, advance surgical training, and to credential surgeons as technically competent. Simulators in their current form have been demonstrated to improve the operating room performance of surgical residents. Development of standardized training curricula remains an urgent and important agenda, particularly for minimal invasive surgery. An innovative and progressive approach, borrowing experiences from the field of aviation, can provide the foundation for the next century of surgical training, ensuring the quality of the product. As the technology develops, the way we practice will continue to evolve, to the benefit of physicians and patients.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2006

Measuring laparoscopic operative skill in a video trainer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery requires a unique set of technical skills. More experienced laparoscopic surgeons perform certain tasks more efficiently in a video trainer than less experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The presumption is that the experienced surgeon possesses more of the skill required to complete the task. This study sought to determine the degree to which previous laparoscopic operative experience influenced the performance of selected video trainer tasks of varying complexity. METHODS: In this study, 19 general surgery residents with varying levels of laparoscopic operative case experience (as defined by operative case logs) were timed performing five tasks in a video trainer. The tasks were rope pass, peg drop, peg exchange, needle pass, and knot tie. All the residents watched a video demonstration of each skill before testing. None of the residents had previous exposure to video trainers, and no practice was allowed before testing. A composite score for all tasks was calculated for each resident as a measure of overall performance. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between operative experience and time required for successful completion of each task, with the exception of the rope pass. The magnitude of correlation increased with tasks of increasing complexity. Composite scores were correlated with operative experience. Significant interval improvements in performance were observed for increasing experience up to a level of approximately 100 previous laparoscopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Overall composite scores and time required for the completion of each individual video trainer task (with the exception of the rope pass) may be an accurate reflection of laparoscopic surgical skill acquired in the operating room. A resident may need as many as 100 laparoscopic cases for full development of a basic skill set in the operating room. A more efficient and safe method of training, such as a validated skills curriculum conducted in a dry lab, is a desirable alternative to developing skill exclusively in the operating room.

Clinical Competence↗