PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15627016

Gallium compounds as antineoplastic agents.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an outline of the basic and clinical information on gallium nitrate as an antineoplastic agent. Although early clinical trials indicated that gallium nitrate had activity against lymphoma and bladder cancer, its subsequent development centered primarily on its effect on bone metabolism and not on its antineoplastic activity. As a result, the drug was approved for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. However, pharmaceutical production of gallium nitrate ceased during the late 1990s, bringing several gallium-based clinical trials to a halt. Gallium nitrate has recently become commercially available, thus reopening the door for clinical trials evaluating it as an antineoplastic agent. RECENT FINDINGS: Multicenter clinical trials have recently been conducted to reevaluate gallium nitrate for the treatment of lymphoma. An oral formulation of gallium is also in development. Gallium's mechanisms of action include its binding to transferrin, targeting to transferrin receptors on lymphoma cells, and inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase. Recent investigations show that gallium activates caspases and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway, whereas complementary DNA microarray studies suggest that changes in intracellular trafficking pathways may be important in gallium resistance. SUMMARY: Gallium nitrate has demonstrated activity against lymphoma and bladder cancer, which is likely the result of selective targeting of these malignancies. An important property of gallium nitrate is that it is not myelosuppressive and it lacks cross-resistance to other drugs. Further investigations are needed to understand better its molecular targets and to determine its clinical efficacy in combination with other drugs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christopher R Chitambar. 2004. Gallium compounds as antineoplastic agents.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cco.0000142071.22226.d2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Favorable response of intraommaya topotecan for leptomeningeal metastasis of neuroblastoma after intravenous route failure.

A 3-year-old male, diagnosed with stage 4 neuroblastoma, developed recurrent leptomeningeal metastasis after multi-modality treatment including multi-agent chemotherapy, surgery, high dose chemotherapy plus stem cell rescue, cis-retinoic acid and intravenous (IV) topotecan. He then received intraommaya (IO) topotecan three times weekly (maximum dose; 0.4 mg). A complete response was achieved by a resolution of malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid and resolution leptomeningeal enhancement by brain MRI. Treatment toxicities included low-grade fever and minimal headache. The duration of treatment response from IO topotecan was 18 weeks. The survival time from CNS recurrence in this patient was 13 months. We suggest IO topotecan be considered for neoplastic meningitis of tumors with known sensitivity to topotecan.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Mobilization of Ph chromosome-negative peripheral blood stem cells in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib-induced complete molecular remission.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is rare in the pediatric population. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy; however, identifying a fully matched donor is not always possible. Imatinib mesylate has been shown to induce hematologic and cytogenetic response in adults and children with CML. We describe a child who achieved molecular remission with imatinib mesylate. BCR-ABL negative peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were successfully collected after mobilization with filgrastim.

Antineoplastic Agents↗