PubMed · 15635846
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Martina Weber. 2004. [Abandoning reports].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15635846/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
UNLABELLED: Politicity of care deals with the intelligent and disruptive handling of help-power. Such notion can mainly be expressed by the trihedron getting to know to care better, delivering care to confront, delivering care to emancipate which, when adapted to the work process in health, may become emancipatory. This theoretical-philosophical reflection explores the ambiguous aspect of care, expressed by being solidary and becoming political. OBJECTIVES: a- to reflect about the politicity of care, as management of help-power, which is capable of emancipatory subversion; b- to discuss the way capitalist societies deal with health care; c- to point out disruptive dynamics to nurses, based on the emancipatory trihedron of care. The main idea of this article is to indicate applicabilities for the conception of politicity of care in the sphere of the nursing work process, signaling emancipatory potentialities.
AIMS: This discussion paper offers an introductory text for nurses and explores the psychoanalytic ideas of transference, counter-transference and repetition compulsion. Disguised case vignettes provide illustrations of the ideas as they might apply to nursing, including professional practice and occupational choice. BACKGROUND: The literature suggests that transference can be a source of creativity as well as destructiveness and influence important communications with oneself and others including the choice of nursing and other health professions as an occupation. Recognizing possibilities of transference, counter-transference along with repetitive patterns of behaviours, can help nurses of all specialities to address situations constructively by responding thoughtfully and appropriately. CONCLUSION: This discussion concludes with the suggestions that we know little about the motivational factors underlying nursing as an occupational preference; moreover, nursing does not have a culture of personal therapy. As such nurses are denied opportunities to understand the possible reasons underlying their occupational choice or gain experiential knowledge of interpersonal dynamics occurring between patients and colleagues. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Transference and counter-transference are thought to have some bearing on all relationships. Forming a natural part of the way human beings relate to each other, transference and counter-transference can bring about sincere human interest, caring and concern. However, there is also potential for disagreements. Recognizing the possible origins of relational difficulties can offer opportunities for professional development to nurses along with the benefits for health service users.
From a very young age, we played doctors and nurses. Back then, society was positive that a nursing profession existed. Now, is society's vision adequate? Evidently not. But, Why does this distortion exist? Fundamentally this occurs because the professionals themselves do not have a clear identity regarding their profession. And Why is this? Because the education transmitted has important lacks, the sanitary system dampens innovation and creativity, there are no appropriate leaders, lobbies transform into "wolves", and neither do we have a tradition which facilitates association and cooperation amongst professionals. These are some of the factors which the author develops in this deep, brave analysis about the reality of the nursing profession in order to arrive at the conclusion that we must have clear in our minds what nursing power is, a power which interacts with the community, and that this is important not only as a power in itself but rather as a means to increase the intrinsic value of nursing, none other than providing care.