PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15645836

[Dual-photon bone densitometry in dialyzed patients].

Abstract

In non-invasive diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy the levels of bone minerals and the extent of bone turnover are evaluated. The contents of bone minerals are assessed quantitatively by different modalities of bone densitometry, among which the most accurate one is double-energy bone densitometry. So far no standard examination method was defined nor the most suitable portion of the skeleton for densitometric examination. In order to find such an area and also to assess the prevalence of bone demineralization, its severity and regional differences the authors made a cross-sectional study of bone density in dialyzed patients. The group comprised 45 patients, 24 men and 21 women subjected to regular dialyzation treatment for 20-24 months. In a lambda whole body bone densitometry was performed with evaluation of regional densities of the trunk, upper and lower extremities. At the same time the state of bone turnover was assessed arbitrarily using values of serum concentrations of intact parathormone; parathormone concentrations below 50 pg/ml were considered low, above 200 pg/ml high and concentrations within the mentioned range as the normal bone turnover. In the group of patients 62% had a high, 22% a normal and 16% a low bone turnover. The study provided evidence of a significant reduction of bone density (Z score <-1) in 58% of patients. In 92% of patients demineralization affected most and first the extremities. In 69% it affected the lower extremities and in 23% the upper ones. 8% of the patients had the most severe affections in the area of the trunk. This order of affliction was not influenced by bone turnover, sex and in women by age. The diaphysis of long bones seems to be a representative examination area of the skeleton for densitometric measurements in patients with regular dialyzation treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Jaros, M Budíková, J Bartek, J Zadrazil, K Konecný, K Krejcí, P Vrublovský, J Zahálková, Z Kosatíková. 2000. [Dual-photon bone densitometry in dialyzed patients].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15645836/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A repeated measures concordance correlation coefficient.

The concordance correlation coefficient is commonly used to assess agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response when the data are measured on a continuous scale. However, the situation may arise in which repeated measurements are taken for each rater or method, e.g. longitudinal studies in clinical trials or bioassay data with subsamples. This paper proposes a coefficient for measuring agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response in the presence of repeated measurements. We illustrate the methodology with examples comparing (1) 1-hr versus 2-hr blood draws for measuring cortisol in an asthma clinical trial and (2) two measurements of percentage body fat, from skinfold calipers and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of a domain in the Runx2 transcription factor that interacts with the 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 receptor.

The Runx2 transcription factor is a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation. In response to 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3, Runx2 may interact with the 1alpha,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 receptor (VDR) in the promoter of target genes, producing a synergic activation of their transcription. Previous studies have suggested that the motifs responsible for the VDR-Runx2 interaction are contained within the 230-361 domain of Runx2. In this work, we confirmed by GST-pull down that Runx2(I(209-361)) is sufficient to interact with the VDR. To obtain structural information, GST-Runx2(I(209-361)) protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, purified and crystallized using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method and polyethyleneglycol as a precipitant. The crystals were found to diffract to a maximum resolution of 2.7 A and a complete data set to a 3.3 A resolution was collected and analyzed. The crystals belong to the tetragonal system, with a space group P4 and unit-cell parameters of a = b = 90.8, and c = 57.2 A. The presence of a monomer of the recombinant GST-Runx2(I(209-361)) in the asymmetric unit gives a V(M) of 2.7 A(3) Da(-1) and a solvent content of 54.8%.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Quantifying the treatment effect explained by markers in the presence of measurement error.

Surrogate markers or intermediate markers are important in identifying subjects with high risk of a serious disease or for monitoring disease progression of a subject on treatment. Quantifying the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained by markers has been studied extensively. Due to reasons such as biological variation, limited machine precision, etc. markers are generally measured with error. The estimated PTE ignoring the measurement error could be biased, which may lead to incorrect conclusions. In this article, we adjust for the measurement error using regression calibration to construct a less biased estimator of excess relative odds, a quantity to measure the treatment effect explained by markers. The method is applied to data from a clinical study in osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗