PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15658473

[Reporting system in surgical pathology].

Abstract

The questionnaire survey on quality assurance in pathology departments and certified hospitals was performed by Japanese Society of Pathology in 2001 and it showed that most institutions do not have guidelines for the reporting system. In this paper, how to write histopathology reports is described. The reports are composed of 1) clinical data, 2) pathology data, 3) macroscopic findings, 4) microscopic findings, 5) diagnoses, and 6) comments. Neither of the components should be made light of. We also describe the results of questionnaire survey on histopathology reports we performed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, Shin-ichi Nakamura. 2004. [Reporting system in surgical pathology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15658473/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Review of Penner's criteria for proficiency testing in cytopathology: implications for the redesign of the federally mandated proficiency testing in cytopathology.

Thirty-three years ago Penner advocated six criteria for the performance of proficiency testing in cytopathology (PTC). Since that time, several further requirements have been added by other authors. The present article critically evaluates and modifies the original criteria and adds two more principles, validity and reliability, that we recognize as crucially important in the performance of PTC. The revised criteria should be taken into consideration in the planned technical redesign of the nationwide PTC.

Cytodiagnosis↗