PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15660142

Avoiding carcinogen exposure with intraperitoneal paclitaxel.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) is a lipid-soluble plasticizer commonly used in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride- (PVC-) based plastics. Previous studies have documented the leaching of DEHP from PVC-based containers and extension sets during the IV administration of paclitaxel. DESIGN: Study of the leaching of DEHP from infusion bags and peritoneal dialysis solution transfer sets and clinical study of DEHP was proposed. SETTING: The experiments were performed in a laboratory with plastic ware normally used for intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivery. SAMPLE: Samples were taken from fluids that had been in contact with the plastic ware. Also, blood, peritoneal fluid, and urine were collected from a patient. METHODS: In a controlled laboratory environment, the authors used an established high-performance liquid chromatography assay to determine the rate and extent of DEHP leaching from infusion bags and in the solution transfer set used for early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) administration of paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was tested at a concentration of 40 mg/L to simulate the median dose used for EPIC. In a single patient receiving 34 mg paclitaxel in 1 liter of 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysis solution (Dianeal), the presence and concentration of DEHP in samples of peritoneal fluid and urine were determined during the first 24-hour EPIC administration. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: DEHP levels in fluids exposed to plastic ware and in the patients blood, peritoneal fluid, and urine were determined. FINDINGS: The in vitro studies showed that a solution of 40 mg paclitaxel dissolved in a 1 liter bag of Dianeal resulted in the extraction of approximately 26 mg DEHP over 24 hours. Approximately 2 mg DEHP was leached during the first hour and approximately 1 mg per hour over the following 23 hours. Equivalent results were obtained when 20 mg paclitaxel was dissolved in a 500 ml bag of 6% hetastarch (Hespan) with a leaching of approximately 13 mg DEHP in 24 hours. Using the same paclitaxel concentration, the chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis solution transfer tubing with a total capacity of 10 ml produced approximately 2 mg DEHP over 24 hours, of which approximately 0.5 mg was produced during the first four hours. Samples from a single patient showed that immediately prior to administration, a 1 liter bag of Dianeal containing 34 mg paclitaxel had about 3.3 mg DEHP. Approximately 3% (110 mcg) of unchanged DEHP was recovered from the peritoneal fluid at 24 hours. Total DEHP excreted in urine over the 24-hour period was approximately 900 mcg (27%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the carcinogen DEHP is leached after preparation of paclitaxel from PVC-based containers and DEHP constantly accumulates in the solution transfer tubing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Unless precautionary steps are taken, DEHP can be transferred to patients receiving intraperitoneal paclitaxel. Steps to minimize patient exposure to DEHP during EPIC with paclitaxel are necessary. In the ideal situation, no DEHP-containing plastic should be used for chemotherapy delivery. If that is not possible, (a) paclitaxel solution should be administered as soon as possible after preparation by the pharmacy, (b) infusion should proceed as rapidly as possible via the Tenckhoff catheter, and (c) the Tenckhoff catheter and extension tubing should be cleared by draining ascites fluid through these tubes prior to subsequent intraperitoneal infusions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Oswald A Stuart, Claudette Knight, Paul H Sugarbaker. 2005-01-19. Avoiding carcinogen exposure with intraperitoneal paclitaxel.. https://doi.org/10.1188/05.onf.44-48

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Anti-apoptotic role of TWIST and its association with Akt pathway in mediating taxol resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, has been reported to be associated with development and progression of human cancer. Recently, over expression of TWIST is found in cancer patients with shorter survival and poor response to chemotherapy. Previously, we found that upregulation of TWIST was responsible for the development of acquired resistance to taxol in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell line, HNE1-T3 (Wang et al., Oncogene, 2004;24:274). In this study, we investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the TWIST-mediated taxol resistance. By comparison of the parental HNE1 and its derivative HNE1-T3 cell lines, we found that the resistance to taxol in HNE1-T3 cells was associated with suppression of taxol-induced apoptosis evidenced by decreased expression of Bak and Bax and increased Bcl-2, as well as inhibition of PARP and caspase cleavage and DNA ladder formation. However, there was no correlation between taxol sensitivity and alterations on G2/M cell cycle distribution, suggesting that the TWIST-induced taxol resistance is mediated through protection against apoptosis but not mitotic arrest. Analysis of additional 8 NPC cell lines showed that upregulation of TWIST was associated with resistance to microtubule disrupting agents, especially taxol, and inactivation of TWIST through small RNA interference led to increased sensitivity to taxol-induced cell death. Subsequent studies also demonstrated that the TWIST-mediated taxol resistance may be regulated through its positive involvement with the Akt pathway. Our findings suggest an underlying molecular mechanism responsible for the TWIST-mediated chemodrug resistance and suggest a target for overcoming taxol resistance in cancer cells.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Dietary polyphenolic phytochemicals--promising cancer chemopreventive agents in humans? A review of their clinical properties.

Epidemiological and preclinical evidence suggests that polyphenolic phytochemicals exemplified by epigallocatechin gallate from tea, curcumin from curry and soya isoflavones possess cancer chemopreventive properties. Whilst such naturally occurring polyphenols have been the subject of numerous mechanistic studies in cells, information on their clinical properties, which might help assess their promise as human cancer chemopreventive agents, is scarce. Therefore, we present a review of pilot studies and trials with a cancer chemoprevention-related rationale, in which either healthy individuals or patients with premalignant conditions or cancer received polyphenolic phytochemicals. The review identifies trial design elements specifically applicable to polyphenolic phytochemicals. The available evidence for tea polyphenols tentatively supports their advancement into phase III clinical intervention trials aimed at the prevention of progression of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, leukoplakia or premalignant cervical disease. In the case of curcumin and soya isoflavones more studies in premalignacies seem appropriate to optimise the nature and design of suitable phase III trials. The abundance of flavonoids and related polyphenols in the plant kingdom makes it possible that several hitherto uncharacterised agents with chemopreventive efficacy are still to be identified, which may constitute attractive alternatives to currently used chemopreventive drugs.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Role of the progesterone receptor for paclitaxel resistance in primary breast cancer.

Paclitaxel plays an important role in the treatment of primary breast cancer. However, a substantial proportion of patients treated with paclitaxel does not appear to derive any benefit from this therapy. We performed a prospective study using tumour cells isolated from 50 primary breast carcinomas. Sensitivity of primary tumour cells to paclitaxel was determined in a clinically relevant range of concentrations (0.85-27.2 microg ml(-1) paclitaxel) using an ATP assay. Chemosensitivity data were used to study a possible association with immunohistochemically determined oestrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) status, as well as histopathological parameters. Progesterone receptor (PR) mRNA expression was also determined by quantitative RT-PCR. We observed a clear association of the PR status with chemosensitivity to paclitaxel. Higher levels of immunohistochemically detected PR expression correlated with decreased chemosensitivity (P=0.008). Similarly, high levels of PR mRNA expression were associated with decreased paclitaxel chemosensitivity (P=0.007). Cells from carcinomas with T-stages 3 and 4 were less sensitive compared to stages 1 and 2 (P=0.013). Multiple regression analysis identified PR receptor status and T-stage as independent predictors of paclitaxel chemosensitivity, whereas the ER, N-stage, grading and age were not influential. In conclusion, in vitro sensitivity to paclitaxel was higher for PR-negative compared with PR-positive breast carcinoma cells. Thus, PR status should be considered as a possible factor of influence when designing new trials and chemotherapy protocols.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗