PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15669989

Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization.

Abstract

AIM: To determine the feasibility and safety of carrying out elective lower-segment cesarean section without urethral catheterization. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was carried out at a private hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka. A pilot study involving 50 women was carried out to measure the volume of urine obtained at the beginning and at the end of cesarean section, using an indwelling catheter. In the main study, surgery was carried out without urethral catheterization on 344 women who had voided within the previous hour. RESULTS: The mean volume of urine collected at the beginning and at the end of surgery was 25.5 and 42.8 mL, respectively. This volume was calculated to be accommodated in spheres of 4.0 and 4.6 cm in diameter, respectively. In the main study, 73% had the bladder distended to a level <3 cm from the lower cut edge of the rectus sheath. In the remaining 27% it was above this level, but covered completely by Doyen's retractor. There were no cases of accidental cystotomy. The difference in the mean time taken for surgery in the two groups was not significant (P=0.30). Distress catheterization was required in two (0.58%). The rest voided after a mean of 8.76 h (SD=2.37). The majority (68.2%) voided in the toilet. The difference in the urinary infection rates between the two groups (6%vs 0.58%) was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section without urethral catheterization does not compromise the safety or ease of surgery. It reduces the risk of urinary infection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hemantha Senanayake. 2005. Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00237.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Trends in fetal and infant survival following preeclampsia.

CONTEXT: Management of preeclampsia often culminates in induced delivery of a very preterm infant. While early termination protects the fetus from an intrauterine death, the newborn then faces increased risks associated with preterm delivery. This practice has increased in recent decades, but its net effect on fetal and infant survival has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on fetal and infant survival of increased rates of early delivery of preeclamptic pregnancies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based observational longitudinal study using registry data from 804 448 singleton first-born infants with Norwegian-born mothers and registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway between 1967 and 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio (OR) of fetal and early childhood death in relation to preeclampsia. RESULTS: Among preeclamptic pregnancies, inductions before 37 weeks increased from 8% in 1967-1978 to nearly 20% in 1991-2003. During this period, the adjusted OR for stillbirth decreased from 4.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-4.7) to 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7) for preeclamptic compared with nonpreeclamptic pregnancies. During the same period, the OR for neonatal death after preeclamptic pregnancy remained relatively stable (1.7 in 1967-1978 vs 2.0 in 1991-2003). Later infant and childhood mortality also showed little change. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal survival in preeclamptic pregnancies has vastly improved over the past 35 years in Norway, presumably because of more aggressive clinical management. However, the relative risk of neonatal death following a preeclamptic pregnancy has not changed over time.

Cesarean Section↗