PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15673866

Large concentrations of nitrous oxide decrease the isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration sparing effect of morphine in the rat.

Abstract

Many adjuvant drugs have demonstrated anesthetic-sparing properties when combined with volatile anesthetics. Nitrous oxide is combined with volatile anesthetics to reduce the concentrations of volatile anesthetics required to produce anesthesia. Analgesic doses of opioids clearly reduce the requirement for inhaled anesthetics in both human patients and experimental animals. We performed this study to determine whether the combination of nitrous oxide and morphine decreased isoflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) even further in the rat. Fifty-eight female rats were used. The rats were divided into 8 groups: isoflurane in 4 possible nitrous oxide concentrations (0%, 30%, 50%, or 70%) with saline or morphine (1 mg/kg). Then the MAC of isoflurane (MAC(ISO))was determined from alveolar gas samples at the time of tail clamp. The MAC of isoflurane was significantly different at each nitrous oxide concentration, and increasing nitrous oxide concentrations reduced anesthetic requirements for isoflurane. The administration of morphine reduced the MAC(ISO) when used with 0% or 30% nitrous oxide. This MAC(ISO) by morphine reduction was less with 50% nitrous oxide and nonexistent at 70% nitrous oxide. However, with morphine present the MAC(ISO) was independent of the nitrous oxide concentration in the 30%-70% range.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Martín Santos, Viviana Kuncar, Fernando Martínez-Taboada, Francisco J Tendillo. 2005. Large concentrations of nitrous oxide decrease the isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration sparing effect of morphine in the rat.. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000142423.87593.ce

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Endomorphin-2 and endomorphin-1 promote the extracellular amount of accumbal dopamine via nonopioid and mu-opioid receptors, respectively.

Activation of mu-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is known to increase accumbal dopamine efflux in rats. Endomorphin-2 (Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH(2); EM-2) and endomorphin-1 (Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH(2); EM-1) are suggested to be the endogenous ligands for the mu-opioid receptor. As the ability of EM-2 and EM-1 to alter the accumbal extracellular dopamine level has not yet been studied in freely moving rats, the present study was performed, using a microdialysis technique that allows on-line monitoring of the extracellular dopamine with a temporal resolution of 5 min. A 25 min infusion of either EM-2 or EM-1 into the NAc (5, 25, and 50 nmol) produced a dose-dependent increase of the accumbal dopamine level. The EM-2 (50 nmol)- and EM-1 (25 and 50 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux were abolished by intra-accumbal perfusion of tetrodotoxin (2 muM). Intra-accumbal perfusion of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist CTOP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH(2); 3 nmol) failed to affect the EM-2 (50 nmol)-induced dopamine release, whereas it significantly inhibited the EM-1 (25 and 50 nmol)-induced dopamine release. The EM-1 (50 nmol)-induced accumbal dopamine efflux was significantly reduced by the systemic administration of the putative mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine (15 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), given 24 h before starting the perfusion). Systemic administration of the aspecific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg, i.p., given 10 or 20 min before starting the perfusion) also failed to affect the EM-2 (50 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux, whereas it significantly inhibited the EM-1 (25 and 50 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux. The present study shows that the intra-accumbal infusion of EM-2 and EM-1 increases accumbal dopamine efflux by mechanisms that fully differ. It is concluded that the effects of EM-2 are not mediated via opioid receptors in contrast to the effects of EM-1 that are mediated via mu1-opioid receptors in the NAc.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Development of pharmaceutical heroin preparations for medical co-prescription to opioid dependent patients.

Presently, there is a considerable interest in heroin-assisted treatment: co-prescription of heroin to certain subgroups of chronic, treatment-resistant, opioid dependent patients. In 2002, nine countries had planned (Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Spain) or ongoing (Germany, The Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom) clinical trials on this subject. These trials (and the routine heroin-assisted treatment programs that might result) will need pharmaceutical heroin (diacetylmorphine) to prescribe to the patients. Research into the development of pharmaceutical forms of heroin for prescription to addicts can benefit from the large amount of knowledge that already exists regarding this substance. Therefore, in this paper we review the physicochemical and pharmaceutical properties of diacetylmorphine and the clinically investigated routes of administration, as well as routes of administration utilised on the street in the context of developing pharmaceutical heroin formulations for prescription to addicts. Patient acceptability of the formulation is essential, because heroin-assisted treatment is aimed at treatment-resistant addicts, who often have to be encouraged to participate (or to maintain participation) in a treatment program. This means that the most suitable products would have pharmacokinetic profiles mimicking that of diacetylmorphine for injection, with rapid peak concentrations of diacetylmorphine and 6-acetylmorphine, ensuring the 'rush effect' and the sustained presence of morphine(-6-glucuronide) creating the prolonged euphoria. Diacetylmorphine for inhalation after volatilisation (via 'chasing the dragon') seems to be a suitable candidate, while intranasal and oral diacetylmorphine are currently thought to be unsuitable. However, oral and intranasal delivery systems might be improved and become suitable for use by heroin dependent patients.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Effect of supraspinal Nocistatin on Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ antagonism of selective opioid analgesia.

Nocistatin and Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ are two neuropeptides derived from the same precursor protein, pre-pro-Nociceptin. Nocistatin does not bind to Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor but it antagonizes the allodynic and hyperalgesic effect of intrathecal (i.t.) Nociceptin. In this study, we examined the effect of Nocistatin on nociception and opioid analgesia by itself and the nociceptive effect of Nociceptin and antagonistic effect of nociceptin on opioid receptors in tail flick test when given the i.c.v. route. More precisely, supraspinal Nocistatin by itself had no significative effect on nociception and opioid analgesia in the tail flick test but, at the dose of 0.5ng/rat, it reversed the nociceptive effect of Nociceptin and also the antagonistic effect of Nociceptin against analgesia caused by the selective opioid agonists: DAMGO, DPDPE, Deltorphin II and U50 488H. These data suggest that Nocistatin antagonizes the effect of Nociceptin on opioid analgesia and could play an important role in the regulation of nociceptive transmission.

Analgesics, Opioid↗