PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1568884

[Current problems in the study of noise effects].

A Schick
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article deals with three problems. First, to what extent is the equivalent noise level valid? The halving parameter, the A-weighting, the short integration time, the fast modulations of frequency and dynamic qualities of hearing--all these aspects prove to be problematic even today. Secondly, is noise noxious to our health? It is difficult to prove that noise is detrimental to our health; many people are annoyed by noise; however, only particular groups (children, the elderly, the handicapped, people who wear a hearing aid, people with heart disease) are affected as far as health is concerned, and it is these people who require special protection. Thirdly, how harmful is the personal stereo? There are numerous indications that is harmful when not used correctly. Investigations need to be made into the role of the "Walkman" in the environment of young people.

Explore related subjects

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansNoiseRisk FactorsSocial EnvironmentEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Schick. 1992. [Current problems in the study of noise effects].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1568884/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Should we aspirate middle-ear effusions prior to insertion of ventilation tubes?

BACKGROUND: Routine aspiration of middle-ear effusions prior to ventilation tube (grommet) insertion is practised by many surgeons. It has been suggested that removing the fluid from the middle ear improves immediate post-operative hearing levels and reduces the chance of the ventilation tube becoming obstructed. The potential adverse effects of applying suction to the middle ear include acoustic trauma and an increased risk of tympanosclerosis and otorrhoea. We undertook a review of the literature in order to determine the benefits or side effects associated with middle-ear aspiration prior to ventilation tube insertion. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes associated with aspirating versus not aspirating the middle ear prior to ventilation tube insertion. METHODS: The Cochrane ENT group trials register, DARE, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1960-2005) and EMBASE (1960-2005) were searched using relevant terms. Reference lists of selected studies were scanned for additional research material. RESULTS: Seven studies were identified, of which three fitted the inclusion criteria of our review. Current evidence suggests that aspiration of middle-ear effusions prior to insertion of ventilation tubes is not associated with any improvement in clinical outcome, in terms of post-operative hearing levels, otorrhoea or rates of blockage of ventilation tubes. Significantly increased rates of tympanosclerosis were observed in one study and the development of acoustic trauma was observed; however, no significant association was confirmed. Although more research is needed, there is no evidence that aspiration of middle-ear effusion prior to grommet insertion confers any advantage.

Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced↗
PubMed2006

Design of optimal noise hazard control strategy with budget constraint.

An analytical design procedure to determine optimal noise hazard control strategies for industrial facilities is presented. Its objective is to determine a set of appropriate noise controls to eliminate or reduce noise levels so that workers' daily noise exposure does not exceed a permissible level. From a given noise control budget, engineering controls will be firstly implemented, followed by administrative controls, and then the use of hearing protection devices. Six optimization models are developed and sequentially applied to select appropriate noise controls without exceeding the budget. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed design procedure.

Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced↗