PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15691207

Using aggregate root cause analysis to reduce falls.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In certain categories of adverse events, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities may combine data to produce an aggregate review of the data. Individual root cause analyses are still required for the more serious adverse events. About 100 of the VA acute and long term care facilities contributed data to an analysis of results of 176 root cause analyses (RCAs) for patient falls occurring in the VA system. METHODS: Success was measured through a decreased report of falls and major injures due to falls after each organization's action plans were implemented. In addition, telephone interviews were conducted to understand success factors as well as barriers to implementation of clinical improvements. RESULTS: Of the 745 actions generated (that addressed the root cause), 435 (61.4%) had been fully implemented and another 148 (20.9%) had been partially implemented; 34.4% of the facilities reported reducing falls and 38.9% reported reducing major injuries due to falls. DISCUSSION: The action plans associated with these reductions focused on making specific clinical changes at the bedside rather than policy changes or educating staff. Specific interventions most highly associated with reductions in falls and injuries included environmental assessments, toileting interventions, and interventions that directly addressed the root cause and were the responsibility of a single person (as opposed to a group).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter D Mills, Julia Neily, Diana Luan, Erik Stalhandske, William B Weeks. 2005. Using aggregate root cause analysis to reduce falls.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31004-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of cognitive task on the posture of elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy elderly subjects.

The aims of this study were to analyze the effects of cognitive task on static posture in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and in healthy elderly (HE) subjects and to evaluate whether those effects were greater in AD subjects than in HE subjects. We performed a posturographic analysis on 13 subjects with mild AD (mean age, 79.7+/-5.1 years, Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 18 and 23) and on 17 HE subjects (mean age, 78.5+/-4.4 years). After watching a video sequence, the subjects were asked to maintain a stable upright posture while standing on a force platform. Then, the postural sway was measured during the following two conditions: (1) quiet standing and (2) both standing and answering questions about the video sequence. We were interested in the center of pressure (CoP) area and path. For each group, the single task was compared to the dual task for the CoP area and path. We also compared the variability of both CoP area (variation of the CoP area between the single and the dual task) and path (variation of the CoP path between the single and the dual task) between the two groups. We showed that there was no significant difference between the single and the dual task in HE subjects concerning the CoP area and path, in contrast to the AD group, and that variability of both the CoP area and path were significantly greater in the AD subjects than in the HE subjects. This finding may contribute to the risk of falls in AD patients.

Accidental Falls↗

[Management of seriously injured patients without conventional radiography? Does a whole body MSCT scanner replace the conventional X-ray unit in the emergency room?].

BACKGROUND: [corrected] In the Wuerzburg University level one trauma centre, mobile whole-body multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is used as the primary diagnostic tool in multiple trauma patients. A conventional X-ray unit is not available directly in the resuscitation room of the trauma suite. Three cases are reported to discuss whether state-of-the-art trauma management can be done without conventional radiography. METHODS: In each of the three cases reported here, an emergency situation has occurred in which the emergency diagnosis of the chest with the CT-scan was found to be difficult or impossible. These specific situations are described and discussed for each case and a conclusion is given at the end of this paper. RESULTS: Three scenarios were identified in which conventional radiological diagnostics seemed to be necessary in the emergency room despite the availability of the MSCT. One is the patient undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the second is the patient that deteriorates after CT-diagnostic is completed and the third is technical problems with the CT-scanner. CONCLUSION: Whole-body MSCT is not sufficient as the sole diagnostic tool in hemodynamically instable trauma patients requiring resuscitation and needs to be complemented by a conventional x-ray unit for emergency diagnosis of the chest.

Accidental Falls↗

[Trauma mechanism and diagnosis of blunt diaphragmatic rupture].

BACKGROUND: Indirect diaphragmatic rupture (DR) is defined as acquired complete split of the diaphragm after blunt trauma and occurs in 1-5% of massively traumatized patients. The diagnosis is often difficult. However, particular trauma mechanisms and associated injuries may suggest the existence of DR. METHODS: A retrospective study was done of 21 consecutive patients from 1993 to 2004 at an university hospital. RESULTS: This study revealed a striking combination of DR with pelvic fractures (12/21, 57%). Of 19 polytraumatized patients, diagnosis was made initially in 13 (68%) and with a delay in six (32%). Right-sided injuries were common (8/21, 38%). Thus a 'protective' function of the liver does not exist. Diaphragmatic rupture can be missed in ventilated patients until extubation leads to herniation of abdominal organs into the thorax. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic rupture should be excluded in all severely abdominally traumatized patients, in particular those with concomitant pelvic fracture. Computed tomography with oral contrast medium is diagnostic in most cases. Access by laparotomy should be preferred after acute trauma, since additional intra-abdominal injuries are frequent.

Accidental Falls↗