PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15691492

[Auditory rehabilitation].

Didier Bouccara·Paul Avan·Isabelle Mosnier·Alexis Bozorg Grayeli·Evelyne Ferrary·Olivier Sterkers
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Auditory rehabilitation depends of the cause and the severity of the hearing loss (or deafness). Hearing losses dues to middle ear pathologies can beneficiate of medical or surgical treatments, by ossicular prostheses, if it is necessary to restore the function of the ossicles chain. In the sensorineural hearing losses, with inner ear pathology, the use of auditory aid is immediately considered. In the cases for which they are insufficient because of severity of the hearing loss or not suitable because of local non-tolerance, it is possible to use middle ear implant or cochlear implant. The indications of the auditory brainstern implants remain at this day limited to the total bilateral hearing losses due to a complete destruction of cochleae and auditory nerves. These therapeutic orientations are selected after a multidisciplinary evaluation of the deaf person, evaluation that allows the characterization of the hearing loss and its repercussion. In all the cases, the restoration of a bilateral hearing has to be done if possible, making an improvement of the speech comprehension, mainly in the noisy situations, as well as the localization of the sound sources.

Explore related subjects

Cochlear ImplantsEquipment DesignHearingHearing AidsHearing LossHumansProsthesis DesignEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Didier Bouccara, Paul Avan, Isabelle Mosnier, Alexis Bozorg Grayeli, Evelyne Ferrary, Olivier Sterkers. 2005. [Auditory rehabilitation].. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci%2F2005212190

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

[Cochlear implant or regular hearing aid?].

A significant number of deaf patients that have received cochlear implants now achieve higher word recognition scores then those with conventional auditory prostheses. This situation makes the choice of which type of auditory rehabilitation to propose a complex matter in patients with remaining auditory function. Our paper aims at providing some arguments to these new questions by presenting the clinical experience and practice of the Centre romand d'implants cochléaires. We also address related legal issues. Clinical tools, such as testing the comprehension of lists of logatoms have proved very useful for the evaluation of these particular patients. The evaluation of cochlear implant candidates remains a highly individualized process, necessitating a case by case approach by an experienced multidisciplinary cochlear implant team.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed2006

Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors.

Categorical loudness scaling of electric and acoustic stimuli was performed in cochlear implant (CI) recipients equipped with Nucleus systems in order to achieve a normal loudness perception in the whole dynamic range of acoustic input. For each electrode, the lower and upper limits of electric stimulus were defined by the values corresponding to "very soft" and "too loud". Within this dynamic range, the stimulus strength intervals associated to the verbal categories "soft", "medium", "loud" and "very loud" were determined. The same loudness categories were used for the scaling of acoustic stimuli. From both scaling experiments, the transduction of the CI system can be assessed and the parameters of the individual mapping function yielding a normal loudness growth can be derived. Deviations from optimum mapping can be corrected at least partially by manipulating the parameters of the mapping function. In many cases, however, one mapping function is not sufficient for all channels. The results argue in favour of the development of flexible and channel-specific mapping function parameters in future CI systems.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed2006

The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

The multiple-channel cochlear implant is the first sensori-neural prosthesis to effectively and safely bring electronic technology into a direct physiological relation with the central nervous system and human consciousness, and to give speech perception to severely-profoundly deaf people and spoken language to children. Research showed that the place and temporal coding of sound frequencies could be partly replicated by multiple-channel stimulation of the auditory nerve. This required safety studies on how to prevent the effects to the cochlea of trauma, electrical stimuli, biomaterials and middle ear infection. The mechanical properties of an array and mode of stimulation for the place coding of speech frequencies were determined. A fully implantable receiver-stimulator was developed, as well as the procedures for the clinical assessment of deaf people, and the surgical placement of the device. The perception of electrically coded sounds was determined, and a speech processing strategy discovered that enabled late-deafened adults to comprehend running speech. The brain processing systems for patterns of electrical stimuli reproducing speech were elucidated. The research was developed industrially, and improvements in speech processing made through presenting additional speech frequencies by place coding. Finally, the importance of the multiple-channel cochlear implant for early deafened children was established.

Cochlear Implants↗