PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15693676

Impossible shadows and lightness constancy.

Alessandro Soranzo·Tiziano Agostini
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the 'ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same. In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illumination frame. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.

Explore related subjects

Contrast SensitivityHumansLightingOptical IllusionsPsychophysicsVisual PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Soranzo, Tiziano Agostini. 2004. Impossible shadows and lightness constancy.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Fine temporal properties of center-surround interactions in motion revealed by reverse correlation.

Center-surround interactions are a key property of visual motion mechanisms. Using a temporal reverse correlation method with human observers, we investigated perceptual interactions between a brief center motion (approximately 20 ms) and a surround that moved up-down with a new direction chosen randomly every 5 ms. The aim was to reveal interactions between center and surround motions and their dependency on relative direction, contrast, and timing. Hypothesizing that surround computation involves different neural circuitry than the center response, we manipulated surround contrast to affect the relative timing of center and surround signals. The reverse correlation analysis yielded temporal profiles of surround influence indicating, in 5 ms steps, the time course of the effect of the surround on the discriminability of center motion. The resulting temporal profiles varied systematically with contrast: as surround contrast decreased, both the latency and duration of its influence increased. This finding, consistent with longer and variable neural response latencies at low contrast, psychophysically reveals fine-scale temporal interactions between center and surround signals. Additionally, the strength of surround influence was correlated with psychophysical thresholds for discriminating center motion. The directionality of this relationship, however, depended only on center contrast. When center motion was high contrast, poor direction discrimination was associated with an increased probability of same-direction surround motions. Low-contrast center motion, however, was more discriminable when surrounded by motion in the same direction, regardless of surround contrast. This suggests that the previously reported adaptive nature of center-surround interactions in motion is driven primarily by the visibility of the center motion signals.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2006

Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction.

When flanked by collinear Gabor patches, detection thresholds for a target Gabor patch improve by up to a factor of 2. This result has been interpreted as evidence for collinear facilitation. However, facilitation has been observed only for targets near detection threshold, where observers seem uncertain about the location and other properties of the stimulus. So the effect of the flankers may be to reduce this uncertainty. If this is true, then other cues to target location should produce a similar improvement in thresholds. To test this hypothesis, we measured contrast detection thresholds for a Gabor target alone, and in the presence of either a faint circle surrounding the target location, or two high-energy flanking Gabor patches. We also used an adaptive procedure to measure the slope of the psychometric function to determine whether the slopes were considerably lower in the presence of location cues or flanking Gabors, as predicted by signal detection theory when uncertainty is reduced. As observed previously, the presence of collinear flankers improved detection thresholds by a factor of two. Yet, on average, the circle alone accounted for the most of the facilitation; for three of our five observers, it improved thresholds as much as the collinear flankers. Other cues that specified target location produced similar improvements in detection thresholds. The slopes of the psychometric functions were much shallower in the presence of these location cues or the collinear flankers compared to the target-alone condition. This change in the slopes indicates that the threshold improvement is largely due to a significant reduction in uncertainty.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2006

Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

The initial ocular following responses (OFRs) elicited by 1/4-wavelength steps applied to the missing fundamental (mf) stimulus are in the backward direction and largely determined by the principal Fourier component, the 3rd harmonic [Sheliga, B. M., Chen, K. J., FitzGibbon, E. J., & Miles, F. A. (2005). Initial ocular following in humans: A response to first-order motion energy. Vision Research, 45, 3307-3321]. When the contrast of the 3rd harmonic was selectively reduced below that of the next most prominent harmonic-the 5th, which moves in the opposite (forward) direction-then the OFR reversed direction and the 3rd harmonic effectively lost all of its influence as the OFR was now largely determined by the 5th harmonic. Restricting the stimulus to just two sine waves (of equal efficacy when of equal contrast and presented singly) with the spatial frequencies of the 3rd and 5th harmonics of the mf stimulus indicated that the critical factor was the ratio of their two contrasts: when of similar contrast both were effective (vector sum/averaging), but when the contrast of one was <1/2 that of the other then the one with the lower contrast became ineffective (winner-take-all). This nonlinear dependence on the contrast ratio was attributed to mutual inhibition and was well described by a weighted-average model with just two free parameters. Further experiments with broadband and dual-grating stimuli indicated that nonlinear interactions occur not only in the neural processing of stimuli moving in opposite directions but also of stimuli that share the same direction and differ only in their spatial frequency and speed. Clearly, broad-band and dual-grating stimuli can uncover significant nonlinearities in visual information processing that are not evident with single sine-wave stimuli.

Contrast Sensitivity↗