PubMed · 15700861
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Pat Healy. Good relations.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.19.19.18.s29
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In population-based cancer survival studies, the cause-specific survival measures the net survival (excess mortality) due to cancer when the cause of death information is available and reliable. In contrast, when the cause of death is uncertain or unavailable, relative survival, the ratio of the survival rate due to all causes to the expected survival rate, is more appropriate. There is a large body of work on the modelling and hypothesis testing of cause-specific survival, but many of these methods are not directly applicable to relative survival. In this paper, we extend the multiple imputation (MI) methods (Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1999; 8:3-15) to the case of relative survival data. The MI methodology is combined with relative survival to estimate the net survival by changing relative survival data to cause-specific data. This facilitates the direct application to statistical methods developed for the cause-specific survival to the special situation of relative survival. The parameter estimates and the log-rank statistics are obtained by combining the results from multiple imputed cause-specific data. The likelihood-based methods for modelling relative survival data have been implemented by a Windows application called CANSURV (Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed 2005). Although these methods produce accurate parameter estimates, the choice for models and diagnostic tools is limited. The MI method is presented as a simpler alternative. The relative survival data for the colorectal cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, 2002) is used as an illustration. The results are compared with those obtained from the likelihood-based relative survival analysis methods. A sample SAS macro for the MI method is provided.
The authors reviewed all cases of type I spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in Cuba over a 6-year period. The incidence of SMA type I was 3.53 per 100,000 livebirths. When the population was classified according to self-reported ethnicity, the incidence was eight per 100,000 for whites; 0.89 per 100,000 for blacks, and 0.96 per 100,000 for those of mixed ethnicity. Type 1 SMA may occur less frequently in individuals of African ancestry.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.