PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15703559

Hepatobiliary pathology.

Abstract

Insights provided by molecular biology, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy have increased our understanding of the pathogenesis and histopathology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and bile ductular proliferative reactions in a number of liver diseases. Human and chimpanzee liver infected with HCV showed viral-like particles (50 to 60 nm in diameter) as well as aggregates of short tubules that represent viral envelope material. Interactions of HCV core protein with apolipoproteins have a role in the pathogenesis of HCV-related steatosis. Pathologists should be aware of the spectrum of liver pathology described with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) agents for the human immunodeficiency virus infection, which includes microvesicular steatosis and more severe hepatic injury with confluent necrosis. Proliferation of bile ductular structures is influenced by specific molecules and proteins (eg, the mucin-associated trefoil proteins and estrogens). The interplay between Notch receptors and Jagged 1 protein, as expressed by many cells of the liver (including bile duct epithelium) varies in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Cholangiocarcinoma does not appear to be a long-term complication of small duct PSC. The fatty liver diseases, both alcoholic and nonalcoholic, are characterized by production of reactive oxygen species that have detrimental effects such as opening mitochondrial permeability transition pores with resultant release of cytochrome c into the cytosol. Hepatocellular carcinoma is now a recognized late complication of NASH. The derivation of hepatic stem cells, the roles of HFE protein and other hepatic and intestinal transport proteins in hemochromatosis, and the histopathologic interpretive challenge of centrilobular lesions in posttransplant liver biopsies are among other recent studies considered in this review.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jay H Lefkowitch. 2003. Hepatobiliary pathology.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001574-200305000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗