PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15703582

Barrett esophagus.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The importance of an in-depth understanding about Barrett esophagus is ultimately to decrease the mortality and morbidity from esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer by early detection of metaplasia and dysplasia and appropriate therapy. This review summarizes several publications in the past year related to the epidemiology, pathogenesis, screening and surveillance, new methods for detection of metaplasia/dysplasia, and advances in the treatment of Barrett esophagus. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with Barrett esophagus are characterized by the presence of risk factors usually indicative of severe types of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recent insights into epidemiology and pathogenesis have shown that the risk of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma may be related to the increasing length of Barrett esophagus, size of hiatus hernia, and severity of acid reflux. The role of smoking and alcohol consumption remains controversial. Increasing the number of biopsies by repeat standard endoscopy can enhance the yield of intestinal metaplasia in patients with suspected short-segment Barrett esophagus. Costs of surveillance using standard endoscopy and random biopsies would be very high and using special techniques to target specific areas could ultimately help in cost reduction. Emerging data on new techniques and technology such as vital staining with methylene blue and protoporphyrin fluorescence can increase the yield of metaplasia and dysplasia. Biomarkers studies have revealed that p53 mutation by the loss of heterozygosity can help detect patients with low and high risk for cancer progression. Studies thus far have been unclear whether acid suppression alone can impact the malignant progression in Barrett esophagus patients. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase by aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be a promising chemoprevention strategy against dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma development as shown in some recent studies. Nonsurgical treatment by photodynamic therapy or mucosal resection may be a less invasive and organ-sparing option for some patients with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma. SUMMARY: In the past year we have made major strides in our knowledge of this premalignant lesion. Recent studies have shed light in a better understanding of the epidemiology of Barrett esophagus, including clinical and endoscopic factors associated with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma and various biomarkers that would identify patient subsets with low and high risk for cancer progression. This will eventually have significant implications on the screening, surveillance, and treatment of the disease. Advanced endoscopic therapies including mucosectomy or photodynamic therapy may be emerging options in patients with intraepithelial neoplasia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sanjeev Slehria, Prateek Sharma. 2003. Barrett esophagus.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001574-200307000-00011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗