PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15703687

Autoimmune enteropathy: molecular concepts.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enteropathies causing temporary or permanent intestinal failure are a big diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for pediatric gastroenterologists. A now well-recognized and distinct entity is in the form of "autoimmune enteropathy (AIE)". Recent advances in the molecular workup of AIE gave first insight into the pathophysiology of AIE. In this review, we discuss new molecular concepts of AIE resulting in new diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities. RECENT FINDINGS: The identification of disease-causing mutations in the FOXP3 gene as a basic defect resulting in AIE points to a defect in regulatory T-cell homeostasis. FOXP3, primarily expressed by CD4+CD25+regulatory T cells, is a potent transcriptional suppressor and key modulator of T-cell functions. Nonfunctional FOXP3 leads to a tremendous hyperactivation of T cells, resulting in autoimmune aggression, such as seen in patients with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy autoimmune enteropathy X-linked (IPEX) syndrome, a subgroup of AIE. There is recent evidence suggesting that a defect of regulatory factors other than FOXP3 might cause AIE. Anti-enterocyte autoantibodies, another main characteristic of AIE, seem to be of a secondary nature and can no more be considered as directly disease causing. SUMMARY: Based on the profound immune dysregulation, new treatment strategies emerged for AIE. The use of T-cell immunosuppressive drugs, such as tacrolimus combined to steroids, seems to be beneficial in some patients; however, long-term remission is not always possible. Bone marrow transplantation might be the treatment of choice in those patients who do not respond to immunosuppression; however, the first encouraging results remain to be confirmed since to date long-term outcome remains mixed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Frank M Ruemmele, Nicole Brousse, Olivier Goulet. 2004. Autoimmune enteropathy: molecular concepts.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001574-200411000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗