PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15705461

Mitral valve prolapse.

Abstract

Mitral valve prolapse is a common valvular abnormality that is the most common cause of severe non-ischaemic mitral regurgitation in the USA. The overall prognosis of patients with mitral valve prolapse is excellent, but a small subset will develop serious complications, including infective endocarditis, sudden cardiac death, and severe mitral regurgitation. We present a comprehensive review of mitral valve prolapse, examining normal mitral anatomy, the clinical and echocardiographic features of mitral valve prolapse, and the pathophysiology and genetics of the disorder. We discuss the contemporary management of both asymptomatic and symptomatic prolapse, with particular attention to the timing and technique of surgical repair. We conclude that echocardiography is the method of choice for diagnosing mitral valve prolapse, that clinical and echocardiographic features can predict which patients with prolapse are at highest risk for complications, and that mitral valve repair is the treatment of choice for symptomatic prolapse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emil Hayek, Christian N Gring, Brian P Griffin. Mitral valve prolapse.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17869-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Electrocardiographic prediction of left ventricular geometric patterns in patients with essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The present study sought to determine the diagnostic value of electrocardiographic voltage criteria in predicting geometry patterns in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with essential hypertension (n=125) according to left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness as determined by echocardiography were assigned in the following groups: normal geometry (N, n=50), concentric remodeling (CR, n=12), concentric hypertrophy (CH, n=28) and eccentric hypertrophy (EH, n=35). Each patient underwent 12-lead ECG followed by determination of conventional voltage criteria as well as peak to peak QRS lengths in each lead. RESULTS: Voltage criteria such as Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell, Cornell product >2440, D1R+D3S >25 mm, and AVL R >11 mm could not significantly predict and discriminate geometric patterns of LVH. However, they all were very specific (range 97-100%) and showed very high positive predictive values (range 94-100%) for detecting abnormal geometry. DI peak >12 mm had a sensitivity 61%, specificity 67%, accuracy 63%, positive predictive value 81%, and negative predictive value 42% in predicting to differentiate CH from CR. Sum of the calculated values from the peak of the R to the nadir of the S wave in all limb leads >60 mm had sensitivity 68%, specificity 75%, accuracy 70%, positive predictive value 86% and negative predictive value 50% in predicting to differentiate CH from CR. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ECG voltage criteria could not significantly discriminate specific geometry patterns observed in patients with essential hypertension.

Echocardiography↗

Echocardiographic evidence of posteromedial hypokinesis of the left ventricle in relation to mitral regurgitation in cardiac sarcoidosis.

We describe herein the case of a 49-year-old female patient with pulmonary sarcoidosis (stage II) with cardiac manifestation. This consisted of systolic dysfunction without dilatation of the left ventricle and severe mitral insufficiency, possibly due to thinning of the posteromedial left ventricular free wall, based on our echocardiographic observations.

Echocardiography↗