PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15719288

[Jurisdiction and imputability].

Abstract

Validity, efficacy and responsibility of acts depend on the intelligence and will of the acting subject; therefore when they are reduced or debilitated, these acts may be declared as non-valid and the author, not-responsible for the acts. Some neurological pathologies may generate physical and/or psychic permanent deficiencies, which prevent subjects from acting on their own. For these cases, the law establishes the incapacity state, in order to protect the disabled and complete the reduced ability, guaranteeing their rights and security. The disabled state will be determined by a legal sentence, which states the lack of ability to manage. In that sentence extension and limits of the disability will be determined; disability level will be proportional to the insight degree.Similarly, a subject suffering a pathological condition that invalidates his/her will and intelligence will be considered non-responsible and not imputable, since there is no culpability ability. The Penal Code establishes the criteria that will determine the possibility of imputability or its absence, as well as modifying circumstances.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Tapiador Sanjuán. 2004. [Jurisdiction and imputability].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15719288/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to highlight and at the same time criticize the holistic view of health expressed in the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)". Particular attention will be paid to the idea suggested in the ICF that not only the ability to perform a specified action but also its actual performance is included in the person's health. My argument intends to show that this is an untenable position. METHOD: The theoretical platform of this paper is philosophical action theory. My argument makes particular use of the distinctions between ability, opportunity, activity and will. My analysis also uses some insights from the contemporary philosophical discussion of health concepts. CONCLUSIONS: Ability (or capacity) and its opposite disability (or incapacity) are essential ingredients in the implicit philosophy of health of the ICF. However, the ICF also puts an emphasis on the actual performance of actions. This is entailed by the performance qualifier that is included in the ICF. I give some arguments for questioning the relevance of this qualifier if it is intended to have a place in the concept of health or have a general function for decisions in health care or rehabilitation. Instead I suggest the introduction of an opportunity qualifier, which could fulfill some of the purposes intended for the performance qualifier.

Persons with Disabilities↗