PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1572959

Interpretive criteria for disk diffusion tests using 5-microgram cefdinir disks with rapidly growing clinical isolates.

Abstract

Preliminary interpretive zone diameter criteria were calculated for the 5-micrograms cefdinir disk diffusion test by using two potential MIC breakpoints (less than or equal to 0.5 and less than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml). The absolute agreement between tests ranged from 85.9 to 92.4%, and the false-susceptibility errors were principally contributed by the Enterobacter spp. (2.2% error). One proposed criterion was greater than or equal to 20-mm zone diameter (less than or equal to 1 micrograms/ml) for susceptibility and less than or equal to 16-mm zone diameter (greater than 2 micrograms/ml) for resistance to cefdinir. Clinical laboratory users of the disk diffusion method should be cautioned about the possibility of very major interpretive errors among enterobacter isolates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R N Jones, M E Erwin, B B Gooding. 1992. Interpretive criteria for disk diffusion tests using 5-microgram cefdinir disks with rapidly growing clinical isolates.. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.4.1022-1023.1992

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Efficacy of penicillin versus cefdinir in eradication of group A streptococci and tonsillar flora.

Core tonsillar cultures were obtained from 40 children with recurrent tonsillitis treated with either penicillin or cefdinir. Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci were isolated from 11 penicillin- and 3 cefdinir-treated (P < 0.001) patients. beta-Lactamase producers were recovered from 17 penicillin- and 3 cefdinir-treated (P < 0.01) patients. Inhibiting alpha-hemolytic streptococci were isolated less often from penicillin-treated patients than from cefdinir-treated patients.

Cefdinir↗

An alternative procedure for preparation of cefdinir.

Cefdinir, a broad spectrum third-generation cephalosporin for oral administration, was prepared by the following synthetic pathway: synthesis of diphenylmethyl 7beta-amino-3-vinyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylate hydrochloride from 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (7-ACA), preparation of sodium 2-(2-tritylaminothiazol-4-yl)-(Z)-2-(tritylhydroxyimino) acetate from ethyl acetoacetate, coupling of both intermediaries to obtain diphenylmethyl 7beta-[2-(2-tritylaminothiazol-4-yl)-(Z)-2-tritylhydroxyimino-3-vinyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylate and final cleavage of trityl and diphenylmethyl protective groups. This procedure allows to obtain better yields of cefdinir and to avoid the use of diketene during the synthesis of this antibiotic by the previously reported method.

Cefdinir↗

Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin V in the treatment of pediatric streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

BACKGROUND: Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis continues to be a prevalent pediatric infectious disease that requires prompt treatment for relief of symptoms and to prevent complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy/tolerability of cefdinir and penicillin V in the treatment of pediatric GABHS tonsillopharyngitis as demonstrated in two clinical trials of similar design. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded trials. PATIENTS: Children < or =12 years of age with sore throat, pharyngeal erythema and positive rapid streptococcal antigen test results. INTERVENTION: In Study A patients took cefdinir 7 mg/kg twice daily or 14 mg/kg once daily or penicillin V 10 mg/kg 4 times daily (all regimens for 10 days). In Study B patients took cefdinir 7 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days or penicillin V 10 mg/kg 4 times daily for 10 days. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and microbiologic evaluations were conducted at multiple times during and after therapy. RESULTS: Of 1274 patients 1122 were evaluable (679 patients received cefdinir; 443 received penicillin V). Clinical cure and microbiologic eradication rates were superior in the combined cefdinir treatment groups (94.9 and 92.7%, respectively), whether given once or twice daily for 10 days or twice daily for 5 days, compared with the penicillin treatment group (88.5 and 70.9%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). Adverse event rates were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Cefdinir is a reliable and well-tolerated drug for the management of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis in children.

Cefdinir↗