PubMed · 15738086
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Regina M Sullivan. 2005. Developmental changes in olfactory behavior and limbic circuitry.. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse%2Fbjh159
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Latent inhibition (LI) is the proactive interference of inconsequential preexposure to a stimulus with its ability to signal significant events, and disrupted LI is considered to model positive symptoms of schizophrenia. We have recently shown that lesions of the nucleus accumbens core (NACc), basolateral amygdala (BLA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) produce abnormally persistent LI, and suggested that this phenomenon may model negative symptoms. Here we tested whether NACc, BLA and OFC lesion-induced persistent LI would be reversed by the atypical antipsychotic drug (APD) clozapine but not by the typical APD haloperidol. Because clozapine's action is likely reflecting its 5HT2A receptor antagonism, we also tested whether NACc lesion-induced persistent LI would be reversed by the selective 5HT2A antagonist M100907. LI was measured in a conditioned emotional response procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats receiving 0 (non-preexposed) or 40 tone presentations (preexposed) followed by five tone-shock pairings. Under these conditions, control rats did not show LI but all lesioned rats persisted in exhibiting LI, and this was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol. In addition, M100907 reversed NACc lesion-induced persistent LI. These two novel phenomena, abnormally persistent LI and its selective reversal by an atypical APD, suggest a novel index of schizophrenia relevant behavioral abnormality and of atypical antipsychotic activity in the LI model. The identification of brain regions whose damage leads to persistent LI in the rat may provide valuable cues on dysfunctional brain circuits involved in negative symptoms and in the action of atypical APDs.
Amygdala D1 receptors have been implicated in the motivating effects of cocaine-conditioned cues and cocaine itself, but the specific nucleus involved is unclear. Thus, we infused the D1 antagonist, SCH-23390, into the rostral basolateral amygdala (rBLA), caudal basolateral amygdala (cBLA), or central amygdala (CEA), and tested its effects on self-administration of cocaine, as well as reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior by cocaine-conditioned cues or cocaine itself. Two anatomical controls, the posterior regions of basal ganglia (BG) and somatosensory/insular cortices (CTX), were also examined. Cocaine self-administration was increased and cue and cocaine reinstatement were decreased by SCH-23390 infusion into every region when examined across the hour test session, with the exception that cBLA infusion did not alter cocaine reinstatement. In the first 20 min of the session, when SCH-23390 was more localized in the target sites, self-administration was increased by infusion into the CEA, cBLA, BG, and CTX, with lesser increases in the rBLA. Cocaine reinstatement was attenuated during the first 20 min only by infusion into the CEA, rBLA, and CTX. Cue reinstatement was not reliably observed in the first 20 min, but there was a trend for attenuation by infusion into the cBLA, and surprisingly, significant attenuations in the BG and CTX. The findings suggest that D1 receptors in subregions of the amygdala play differential roles in the reinforcing/motivational effects of cocaine, while the cue reinstatement effects are less clear. Further research is needed to examine the novel findings that neighboring regions of the BG and CTX may play a role in motivation for cocaine.
This study is designed to characterize the signal cascades by which brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) modulates long-term memory of fear conditioning. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot analysis of tissue homogenates taken from fear-conditioned rats showed an increase in the amygdala of BDNF protein levels and its receptor TrkB phosphorylation. Bilateral administration of a TrkB ligand scavenger TrkB IgG and a Trk-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor K252a to the amygdala impaired fear memory, as measured with fear-potentiated startle. Fear conditioning resulted in the association of Shc and TrkB, Shc and Ras, the increase in active Ras and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). Treatment of amygdala slices with BDNF for 15 min increased the levels of active Ras, and MAPK and Akt phosphorylation. BDNF-induced MAPK phosphorylation was completely abolished by MEK inhibitors, and was partially inhibited by farnesyltransferase or phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI-3 kinase) inhibitors. On the other hand, BDNF-induced Akt phosphorylation was unaffected by farnesyltransferase or MEK inhibitors, but could be blocked by PI-3 kinase inhibitors. Together, these data suggest a requirement of BDNF for fear learning. The memory-enhancing effect of BDNF involves the activation of MAPK and PI-3 kinase. BDNF-induced MAPK phosphorylation in the amygdala is mediated via TrkB and the Shc-binding site. Shc binding to TrkB leads to activation of Ras, Raf, and MEK. In addition, BDNF could induce phosphorylation of MAPK via activation of PI-3 kinase.