PubMed · 15739925
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Laurence A Savett, Vivian Good. 2004. Continuing education for nurses: a problem-oriented system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15739925/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Due to increasingly better long-term survival rates with dialysis the number of patients with renal failure constantly increases by 4% annually worldwide. Despite great progress in operative and perioperative management as well as improved immunosuppressive drugs, kidney transplantation still faces two major problems. First of all there is a huge deficit of donor organs and secondly the long-term results of the kidney grafts must be improved. One way to relieve this tense situation may be live kidney donation. In many countries not participating in Eurotransplant, especially the United States and Scandinavia, live kidney donation is performed more often than kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Germany implemented a transplantation law in December 1997. This law also regulates living donation, with exclusion of crossover transplantations. Cross-over transplantation is a special variation of live donation for couples who cannot donate/receive in their respective couple constellation. Therefore, the donor of the one couple donates his/her kidney to the recipient of the other couple and vice versa. According to German legislation this is illegal. We performed a study in order to evaluate the opinions of the German kidney transplant centers on crossover kidney transplantations. The majority of the German transplantation centers believe that crossover transplantation is acceptable with regard to ethical and medical concerns. To enable this kind of kidney transplantation the transplantation law would have to be changed. Nevertheless, nationwide polls show that live kidney donation represents only a very small portion of all transplantations taking place. Live kidney donation should be granted higher priority as dialysis triggers psychological and physical damage, especially in children. For many patients live kidney donation is the only chance for early transplantation with an excellent long-lasting kidney graft function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (IDs) experience significant health inequalities compared with the general population. The barriers people with IDs experience in accessing services contribute to these health inequalities. Professionals' significant unmet training needs are an important barrier to people with IDs accessing appropriate services to meet their health needs. METHOD: A three group, pre- and post-intervention design was used to test the hypothesis that a training intervention for primary health care professionals would increase the knowledge and self-efficacy of participants. The intervention had two components - a written training pack and a 3-hour face-to-face training event. One group received the training pack and attended the training event, a second group received the training pack only, and a third group did not participate in the training intervention. Research measures were taken prior to the intervention and 3 months after the intervention. Statistical comparisons were made between the three groups. RESULTS: The participants in the training intervention reported that it had a positive impact upon their knowledge, skills and clinical practice. As a result of the intervention, 35 (81.4%) respondents agreed that they were more able to meet the needs of their clients with IDs, and 33 (66.6%) reported that they had made changes to their clinical practice. The research demonstrated that the intervention produced a statistically significant increase in the knowledge of participants (F = 5.6, P = 0.005), compared with the group that did not participate in the intervention. The self-efficacy of the participants that received both components of the intervention was significantly greater than the group that did not participate in the training (t = 2.079, P = 0.04). Participation in the two components of the training intervention was associated with significantly greater change in knowledge and self-efficacy than those receiving the training pack alone. CONCLUSION: This intervention was effective in addressing the measured training needs of primary health care professionals. Future research should directly evaluate the positive benefits of interventions on the lives of people with IDs.