PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15741915

[Multiple comparison procedures: principles, limits. Applications to microarray phenotype-genotype analysis].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When analysing data which simultaneously implicate a large number of statistical tests, one of the main problems is to take into account the multiplicity of these tests. The huge amount of comparisons done in studies of which the aim is to detect, using microarray, genes whose transcriptional changes are related to a biological or clinical outcome leads to a renewed interest for the multiple comparisons problem. However, this problem concerns many other fields such as psychometry, epidemiology, genetics. RESULTS: First, we introduce the multiple comparison framework. Then, we present the main procedures based on a global error rate called the "Family Wise Error Rate" (FWER) and those based on a false discovery rate expectancy (the "False Discovery Rate" (FDR) and the "positive False Discovery Rate" (pFDR)). Next, we apply the different procedures on a real dataset from a breast carcinoma study. Finally, we discuss the main results and we present guidelines for the use of these procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Dalmasso, P Broët, T Moreau. 2004. [Multiple comparison procedures: principles, limits. Applications to microarray phenotype-genotype analysis].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0398-7620(04)99092-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Can we improve the diagnosis of rupture of membranes? The value of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1.

Our objective was to assess the value of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and other tests for the diagnosis of rupture of the membranes (ROM). We included 49 women with suspected ROM. The gold standard for membranes status was defined based on clinical examination, ultrasonography, tests results (except IGFBP-1) and labour information. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each test were as follows, respectively: IGFBP-1 (86, 74, 73 and 87%); bromothymol (64, 100, 100 and 77%); fern test (62, 96, 93 and 75%) and ultrasonography (19, 100, 100 and 61%). The detection of IGFBP-1 in vaginal secretions has high sensitivity for the diagnosis of ROM.

False Positive Reactions↗

Contamination with PCR detectable virus in a virus isolation quality assurance panel.

External quality control schemes are an essential part of the quality assurance of all diagnostic virology laboratories. There are a few providers of nucleic acid detection quality control panels. Consequently, diagnostic laboratories may test panels that are developed specifically for virus isolation by nucleic acid detection methods. Here, we report on a recent simulated eye swab panel from a National external quality assessment service, which was meant for virus isolation but which we tested by polymerase chain reactions assays. The results suggest that the samples had been contaminated at source leading to difficulty in interpretation of the panel and a poor score.

False Positive Reactions↗