PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15747034

[Prolapse surgery].

Abstract

Operative cystocele/rectocele management and prolapse surgery have become increasingly important domains of urogynecologic surgery. The risk of prolapse surgery in women lies at around 11% today and one-third of these are reoperations. There are currently three competing operative procedures: (1) the transvaginal approach with a vaginae fixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis or sacrotuberalis, (2) transabdominal pelvic sacrocolpopexy, and (3) transabdominal laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.We compared efficacy, reoperation rates, and complication rates in abdominal sacrocolpopexy to those found with the transvaginal or laparoscopic surgical approaches, by reviewing the literature of the last 10 years, including 1995, in an online search. Analysis of the accumulated data made it clear, moreover, that randomized, prospective studies on the three different operative procedures are missing; these are mandatory, however, to enable exact and objective assessment of efficacy, long-term results, and complication rates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K P Jünemann, M Hamann, C Seif. 2005. [Prolapse surgery].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-005-0797-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain: a randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) and the vaginal uterosacral ligament resection (VUSR) in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). STUDY DESIGN: Eighty postmenopausal women with intractable and severe midline CPP were randomized to undergo LUNA or VUSR. Costs of two surgical procedures were assesses. Cure rate, severity of CPP, and deep dyspareunia were also evaluated after 6 and 12 months from surgery. RESULTS: The mean cost of LUNA resulted significantly higher in comparison with VURS (2078+/-637 versus 1497+/-297, P<0.001). The cure rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (33/40, 82.5% versus 35/40, 87.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P=0.530; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.13), and 12 months (27/36, 75.0% versus 28/38, 73.7%, for groups A and B, respectively; P=0.901; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.33) of follow-up. At same times, a significant (P<0.01) decrease in severity of CPP and deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups with no difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: Both LUNA and VUSR are equally effective surgical treatments in postmenopausal women with central CPP but VUNR is significantly cheaper than LUNA.

Colpotomy↗

[Anterior approach sacrospinous colpopexy in a patient with vaginal vault prolapse, stress urinary incontinence and cystocoele with lateral defect].

We present a case of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy associated with cystocoele with central and lateral defect and stress urinary incontinence, that was treated surgically with employment of sacrospinous colpopexy through anterior approach (from paravesical space), combined with anterior colporrhaphy by double TOT approach method (that is a butterfly-shaped polipropylen mesh, which arms were carried through upper and lower parts of obturator foramens by tension-free method). There were no postoperative complications. A control examination at 1 and 3 months after the operation showed maintenance of normal anatomic relations, which were obtained as a result of repair, total control of urinary continence and full patient's satisfaction from the operation.

Colpotomy↗