PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1574850

A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones.

D I MacLeod·D R Williams·W Makous
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An intensive nonlinearity in the visual system can produce distortion products, or difference frequency gratings, when observers view two high contrast, high spatial frequency interference fringes of slightly different frequency or orientation added together at the retina. These distortion products are visible even when the two fringes imaged on the retina are above the resolution limit. Our experiments take advantage of this nonlinearity to measure the spatial filtering in the visual system following the formation of the retinal image, but preceding the site of the nonlinearity. The point spread function corresponding to this spatial filter is so small that it can be entirely explained by light integration within the apertures of foveal and parafoveal cones. The small size of this point spread function implies that (1) laser interferometry avoids contrast losses inherent in the eye's optics at spatial frequencies as high as 130 c/deg, (2) retinal scatter causes negligible image degradation in the fovea and parafoveal retina, (3) eye movements have little or no effect on contrast sensitivity to the distortion product and (4) that there is no neural spatial summation in the visual system prior to the site of the nonlinearity. Distortion products could also be observed when a bright interference fringe was briefly flashed on the fovea and a test interference fringe was viewed through the resulting afterimage. Measurements of the point spread function at stages in the visual system that precede the generation of this distortion product were similar to those obtained with simultaneous presentation of the two fringes, implying that the aftereffect of light adaptation is extremely local, no larger than the dimensions of single cones.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, OcularContrast SensitivityEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansMaleMathematicsModels, NeurologicalPattern Recognition, VisualPhotoreceptor CellsPsychophysicsVisual FieldsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D I MacLeod, D R Williams, W Makous. 1992. A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90144-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect.

Prolonged adaptation to motion in a given direction produces distinctly different visual motion aftereffects (MAEs) when viewing static vs. dynamic test displays. The dynamic MAE can be exactly simulated by real motion, whereas the static MAE cannot. In addition, the magnitude of the dynamic MAE depends on the bandwidth of motion directions experienced during adaptation, whereas the static MAE does not. Evidently a stationary pattern does not directly activate the neural mechanisms affected during motion adaptation, whereas a dynamic visual display does. These results imply that the traditional explanation of the MAE needs modification.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1992

Human vision combines oriented filters to compute edges.

The experiments examined the perceived spatial structure of plaid patterns, composed of two or three sinusoidal gratings of the same spatial frequency, superimposed at different orientations. Perceived structure corresponded well with the pattern of zero crossings in the output of a circular spatial filter applied to the image. This lends some support to Marr & Hildreth's (Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 207, 187 (1980)) theory of edge detection as a model for human vision, but with a very different implementation. The perceived structure of two-component plaids was distorted by prior exposure to a masking or adapting grating, in a way that was perceptually equivalent to reducing the contrast of one of the plaid components. This was confirmed by finding that the plaid distortion could be nulled by increasing the contrast of the masked or adapted component. A corresponding reduction of perceived contrast for single gratings was observed after adaptation and in some masking conditions. I propose the outlines of a model for edge finding in human vision. The plaid components are processed through cortical, orientation-selective filters that are subject to attenuation by forward masking and adaptation. The outputs of these oriented filters are then linearly summed to emulate circular filtering, and zero crossings (zcs) in the combined output are used to determine edge locations. Masking or adapting to a grating attenuates some oriented filters more than others, and although this changes only the effective contrast of the components, it results in a geometric distortion at the zc level after different filters have been combined. The orientation of zcs may not correspond at all with the orientation of Fourier components, but they are correctly predicted by this two-stage model. The oriented filters are not 'orientation detectors', but are precursors to a more subtle stage that locates and represents spatial features.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1992

Polyaxonal amacrine cells of rabbit retina: PA2, PA3, and PA4 cells. Light and electron microscopic studies with a functional interpretation.

Polyaxonal (PA) amacrine cells are a new class of amacrine cell bearing one to six branching, axon-like processes that emerge from the cell body or dendritic trees within 50 microns of the cell body. These slender processes of uniform caliber branch at right angles and in many respects closely resemble the axons of Golgi type II cells found elsewhere in the brain. Of the four types of polyaxonal amacrine cell that we have recognized in rabbit retina, two have been described previously in brief communications. One of these, the PA1 amacrine cell with its interstitially displaced cell body, located in the inner plexiform layer (IPL), has been analyzed extensively in two preceding reports. This paper concerns PA2, PA3, and PA4 amacrine cells. Type 2 polyaxonal (PA2) amacrine cells, identified in Golgi preparations of whole-mounted rabbit retinas, have smaller cell bodies (9-14 microns) than the other three types and these are always displaced to the ganglion cell layer (GCL) or the inner border of the inner plexiform layer (IPL). The dendritic fields of PA2 cells are also smaller than those of other PA amacrine cells, and most of their sparse dendritic branching is narrowly stratified at the border of strata (S) 4 and 5. Some members of this more heterogeneous amacrine cell "type" are bistratified, however, and more highly branched with terminal branches rising to end in S1. PA2 amacrine cells bear a scattering of small dendritic spines and may also exhibit complex dendritic appendages arising at the ends of terminal branches in proximal regions of the dendritic tree. PA2 cells emit one to three axons from the proximal dendritic tree, and about half of the cells bear a single axon. Type 3 polyaxonal (PA3) amacrine cells resemble PA1 cells in the large size of their cells bodies (11-16 microns) and dendritic fields, but differ from the latter in placement of cell bodies, which is in the GCL, and dendritic and axonal stratification, which is multistratified, ranging from S4 to S1, with a concentration in S3 or S4 and a variable contribution to S1. PA3 cells differ from PA1 cells in several other respects, including dendritic branching which occurs at higher frequency and is biased toward temporal retina, and in characteristic bristling dendritic spines, clustered in the intermediate regions of the dendritic tree, that are longer, more variable in appearance and more tightly clustered than the small, uniform spines of PA1 cells that are clustered on proximal dendrites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adaptation, Ocular↗