The probability of parallel evolution.

H Allen Orr

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15792240

The probability of parallel evolution.

H Allen Orr

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

How often will natural selection drive parallel evolution at the DNA sequence level? More precisely, what is the probability that selection will cause two populations that live in identical environments to substitute the same beneficial mutation? Here I show that, under fairly general conditions, the answer is simple: if a wild-type sequence can mutate to n different beneficial mutations, replicate populations will on average fix the same mutation with probability P = 2/(n + 1). This probability, which is derived using extreme value theory, is independent of most biological details, including the length of the gene in question and the precise distribution of fitness effects among alleles. I conclude that the probability of parallel evolution under natural selection is nearly twice as large as that under neutrality.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, Biological Data Interpretation, Statistical Evolution, Molecular Genetics, Population Models, Genetic Mutation Probability Selection, Genetic Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

H Allen Orr. 2005. The probability of parallel evolution.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15792240/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2015

Evolutionary genomics of Culex pipiens: global and local adaptations associated with climate, life-history traits and anthropogenic factors.

We present the first genome-wide study of recent evolution in Culex pipiens species complex focusing on the genomic extent, functional targets and likely causes of global and local adaptations. We resequenced pooled samples of six populations of C. pipiens and two populations of the outgroup Culex torrentium. We used principal component analysis to systematically study differential natural selection across populations and developed a phylogenetic scanning method to analyse admixture without haplotype data. We found evidence for the prominent role of geographical distribution in shaping population structure and specifying patterns of genomic selection. Multiple adaptive events, involving genes implicated with autogeny, diapause and insecticide resistance were limited to specific populations. We estimate that about 5-20% of the genes (including several histone genes) and almost half of the annotated pathways were undergoing selective sweeps in each population. The high occurrence of sweeps in non-genic regions and in chromatin remodelling genes indicated the adaptive importance of gene expression changes. We hypothesize that global adaptive processes in the C. pipiens complex are potentially associated with South to North range expansion, requiring adjustments in chromatin conformation. Strong local signature of adaptation and emergence of hybrid bridge vectors necessitate genomic assessment of populations before specifying control agents.

Adaptation, Biological↗

PubMed2007

How does resource supply affect evolutionary diversification?

The availability of different resources in the environment can affect the outcomes of evolutionary diversification. A unimodal distribution of diversity with resource supply has been widely observed and explained previously in the context of selection acting in a spatially heterogeneous environment. Here, we propose an alternative mechanism to explain the relationship between resource supply and diversification that is based on selection for exploitation of different resources. To test this mechanism, we conducted a selection experiment using the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens in spatially homogeneous environments over a wide range of resource supply rates. Our results show that niche diversification peaks at intermediate levels of resource availability. We suggest that this unimodal relationship is due to evolutionary diversification that is driven by competition for resources but constrained by the ecological opportunity represented by different resource types. These processes may underlie some general patterns of diversity, including latitudinal gradients in species richness and the effects of anthropogenic enrichment of the environment.

Adaptation, Biological↗

PubMed2007

A structure-centric view of protein evolution, design, and adaptation.

Proteins, by virtue of their central role in most biological processes, represent one of the key subjects of the study of molecular evolution. Inherent in the indispensability of proteins for living cells is the fact that a given protein can adopt a specific three-dimensional shape that is specified solely by the protein's sequence of amino acids. Over the past several decades, structural biologists have demonstrated that the array of structures that proteins may adopt is quite astounding, and this has lead to a strong interest in understanding how protein structures change and evolve over time. In this review we consider a large body of recent work that attempts to illuminate this structure-centric picture of protein evolution. Much of this work has focused on the question of how completely new protein structures (i.e., new folds or topologies) are discovered by protein sequences as they evolve. Pursuant to this question of structural innovation has been a desire to describe and understand the observation that certain types of protein structures are far more abundant than others and how this uneven distribution of proteins implicates on the process through which new shapes are discovered. We consider a number of theoretical models that have been successful at explaining this heterogeneity in protein populations and discuss the increasing amount of evidence that indicates that the process of structural evolution involves the divergence of protein sequences and structures from one another. We also consider the topic of protein designability, which concerns itself with understanding how a protein's structure influences the number of sequences that can fold successfully into that structure. Understanding and quantifying the relationship between the physical feature of a structure and its designability has been a long-standing goal of the study of protein structure and evolution, and we discuss a number of recent advances that have yielded a promising answer to this question. Finally, we review the relatively new field of protein structural phylogeny, an area of study in which information about the distribution of protein structures among different organisms is used to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships between them. Taken together, the work that we review presents an increasingly coherent picture of how these unique polymers have evolved over the course of life on Earth.

Adaptation, Biological↗