PubMed · 15795743
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Francesco Nodari, Timothy E Holy. 2005. Olfactory coding: sniffing out signals.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0405-406
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Navigation and dance communication in Apis mellifera have been extensively studied on the level of sensory processing, but the structure and content of the spatial memory underlying such phenomena have yet to be addressed. Here we survey new findings indicating that the memory used by bees to navigate within the range of their orientation flights is much more complex than hitherto thought. It appears to allow them to decide between at least two goals in the field, and to steer towards them over considerable distances. Two models concerning the structure of bees' spatial memory are developed from new empirical evidence. The first one relies on the integration of at least two flight vectors, while the second assumes the existence of a 'functional' map based on the information available on-site. These findings also raise questions about the process of encoding and decoding information in the context of the waggle dance. We review published data and recent evidence indicating that memories of topographical features might also be involved in dance communication, and point out what needs to be addressed to elucidate the corresponding memory demands. The flight paths of recruited bees can now be traced by means of radar techniques, and thus tools are available to tackle these questions.
Shifts in male preference for qualitatively different pheromone blends appear to have played a fundamental role in the divergence of olfactory communication and evolution of moth species. As an initial step in documenting the genetic complexity underlying such shifts, we characterized the behavioral responses of hybrid male moths created by mating two heliothine moth species, Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens. Between 67 and 96% of hybrid males flew upwind and contacted the pheromone source when presented with a blend consisting of (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald), (Z)-9-hexadecenal (Z9-16:Ald), and (Z)-11-hexadecenol (Z11-16:OH) in a 1:0.5:0.1 ratio that has previously been shown to be attractive to H. subflexa males. In addition, an H. virescens blend of Z11-16:Ald and (Z)-9-tetradecenal (Z9-14:Ald) enhanced by the addition of Z11-16:OH (in a 1:0.05:0.1 mixture) was attractive to hybrid males (26-64% source contact), but significantly fewer males reached the odor source compared to the blend containing Z9-16:Ald. A blend in which the dosage of Z9-14:Ald was doubled, however, was equally attractive (75-77% source contact) as the Z9-16:Ald-containing blend. Consecutive presentation of two blends revealed that individual hybrid males responded equally well to blends containing either Z9-14:Ald or Z9-16:Ald. Together these results suggest that in addition to Z11-16:Ald, hybrid males: (1) required either Z9-16:Ald (likeH. subflexamales) or Z9-14:Ald (like H. virescens males); (2) required the presence of Z11-16:OH (H. subflexa dominant); (3) were not adversely affected by the presence of Z11-16:Ac (H. subflexa dominant). The behavioral response phenotype of hybrid males was therefore influenced by genetic factors inherited from both parental species.
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) develop individually distinctive signature whistles that they use to maintain group cohesion. Unlike the development of identification signals in most other species, signature whistle development is strongly influenced by vocal learning. This learning ability is maintained throughout life, and dolphins frequently copy each other's whistles in the wild. It has been hypothesized that signature whistles can be used as referential signals among conspecifics, because captive bottlenose dolphins can be trained to use novel, learned signals to label objects. For this labeling to occur, signature whistles would have to convey identity information independent of the caller's voice features. However, experimental proof for this hypothesis has been lacking. This study demonstrates that bottlenose dolphins extract identity information from signature whistles even after all voice features have been removed from the signal. Thus, dolphins are the only animals other than humans that have been shown to transmit identity information independent of the caller's voice or location.