PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1582623

[The problematic physician-patient encounter].

Abstract

The medical encounter between the physician and the patient may sometimes be difficult, with either or both participants feeling uncomfortable. To try to understand what transpires during an unsatisfactory encounter, it is essential to examine the parts played by the patient and the physician and the context in which the encounter takes place. A problematic patient for one physician may be an ordinary one for another. However, there are some patients who are difficult for most physicians. In this article, the traits of problematic patients are described, as well as personal and professional characteristics of physicians and various circumstances not directly related to the participants that may make the encounter difficult (overcrowded agenda, an external problem which a participant brings to the encounter, and so on). To improve the quality of the medical encounter the physician must first be aware when there is a problem. He must then identify the various causes of the "mutual disagreement" and the participant responsible for it. He must also increase his awareness of his own emotional reactions in order to arrive at a satisfactory personal solution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Steinmetz. 1992-03-15. [The problematic physician-patient encounter].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1582623/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗