PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15838176

Haplotype sharing analysis using mantel statistics.

L Beckmann·D C Thomas·C Fischer·J Chang-Claude
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The potential value of haplotypes has attracted widespread interest in the mapping of complex traits. Haplotype sharing methods take the linkage disequilibrium information between multiple markers into account, and may have good power to detect predisposing genes. We present a new approach based on Mantel statistics for spacetime clustering, which is developed in order to improve the power of haplotype sharing analysis for gene mapping in complex disease. METHODS: The new statistic correlates genetic similarity and phenotypic similarity across pairs of haplotypes for case-only and case-control studies. The genetic similarity is measured as the shared length between haplotypes around a putative disease locus. The phenotypic similarity is measured as the mean-corrected cross-product based on the respective phenotypes. We analyzed two tests for statistical significance with respect to type I error: (1) assuming asymptotic normality, and (2) using a Monte Carlo permutation procedure. The results were compared to the chi(2) test for association based on 3-marker haplotypes. RESULTS: The results of the type I error rates for the Mantel statistics using the permutational procedure yielded pointwise valid tests. The approach based on the assumption of asymptotic normality was seriously liberal. CONCLUSION: Power comparisons showed that the Mantel statistics were better than or equal to the chi(2) test for all simulated disease models.

Explore related subjects

Case-Control StudiesGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic MarkersHaplotypesHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Beckmann, D C Thomas, C Fischer, J Chang-Claude. 2005-04-18. Haplotype sharing analysis using mantel statistics.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085221

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Control of confounding through secondary samples.

The control of confounding is essential in many statistical problems, especially in those that attempt to estimate exposure effects. In some cases, in addition to the 'primary' sample, there is another 'secondary' sample which, though having no direct information about the exposure effect, contains information about the confounding factors. The purpose of this article is to study the influence of the secondary sample on likelihood inference for the exposure effect. In particular, we investigate the interplay between the efficiency improvement and the possible bias introduced by the secondary sample as a function of the degree of confounding in the primary sample and the sizes of the primary and secondary samples. In the case of weak confounding, the secondary sample can only little improve estimation of the exposure effect, whereas with strong confounding the secondary sample can be much more useful. On the other hand, it will be more important to consider possible biasing effects in the latter case. For illustration, we use a formal example of a generalized linear model and a real example with sparse data from a case-control study of the association between gastric cancer and HM-CAP/Band 120.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2006

On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.

The Cochran-Armitage trend test has been used in case-control studies for testing genetic association. As the variance of the test statistic is a function of unknown parameters, e.g. disease prevalence and allele frequency, it must be estimated. The usual estimator combining data for cases and controls assumes they follow the same distribution under the null hypothesis. Under the alternative hypothesis, however, the cases and controls follow different distributions. Thus, the power of the trend tests may be affected by the variance estimator used. In particular, the usual method combining both cases and controls is not an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the null variance when the alternative is true. Two different estimates of the null variance are available which are consistent under both the null and alternative hypotheses. In this paper, we examine sample size and small sample power performance of trend tests, which are optimal for three common genetic models as well as a robust trend test based on the three estimates of the variance and provide guidelines for choosing an appropriate test.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2006

Multiple hypothesis testing strategies for genetic case-control association studies.

The genetic case-control association study of unrelated subjects is a leading method to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP haplotypes that modulate the risk of complex diseases. Association studies often genotype several SNPs in a number of candidate genes; we propose a two-stage approach to address the inherent statistical multiple comparisons problem. In the first stage, each gene's association with disease is summarized by a single p-value that controls a familywise error rate. In the second stage, summary p-values are adjusted for multiplicity using a false discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedure. For the first stage, we consider marginal and joint tests of SNPs and haplotypes within genes, and we construct an omnibus test that combines SNP and haplotype analysis. Simulation studies show that when disease susceptibility is conferred by a SNP, and all common SNPs in a gene are genotyped, marginal analysis of SNPs using the Simes test has similar or higher power than marginal or joint haplotype analysis. Conversely, haplotype analysis can be more powerful when disease susceptibility is conferred by a haplotype. The omnibus test tracks the more powerful of the two approaches, which is generally unknown. Multiple testing balances the desire for statistical power against the implicit costs of false positive results, which up to now appear to be common in the literature.

Case-Control Studies↗