PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15845245

Pattern specificity of human visual motion processing.

Sven P Heinrich·Anette E H Renkl·Michael Bach
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Visual motion processing is strongly susceptible to adaptation. A variety of patterns have been used as stimuli in previous studies. Three of these, namely random dots, barcode-like gratings, and sinusoidal gratings, were compared in the present study using motion-onset visual evoked potentials (VEPs). We assessed the effects of the adaptation pattern and the test pattern to which the VEP is recorded. Furthermore, we evaluated the interaction between both, i.e. whether differences between adaptation and test pattern affect the response. Isodirectional and antidirectional adaptation were used to differentiate between the actual motion adaptation and associated flicker adaptation. Motion adaptation was almost 2.5-fold stronger (p < 0.01) if the same rather than different pattern types were used for both adaptation and test. This implies that separate neural populations are involved, suggesting the presence of pattern-tuned motion mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, OcularAnalysis of VarianceEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualPsychophysicsComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sven P Heinrich, Anette E H Renkl, Michael Bach. 2005. Pattern specificity of human visual motion processing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Adaptation of single photon responses in photoreceptors of the housefly, Musca domestica: a novel spectral analysis.

The absorption of a photon by a photoreceptor triggers a small voltage fluctuation termed the 'bump'. Here, in the housefly, I introduce the bispectrum of photoreceptor noise to characterise the bump under dim light. The bispectrum provides explicit phase information and is not contaminated by Gaussian background noise. Over the photon rates examined (<10(4) s(-1)), I show that bumps are minimum-phase, noise spectra are little affected by natural variations in bump shape and bumps adapt such that amplitude is approximately proportional to duration squared. In the dark exists a 'dark event', which I suggest represents spontaneous activation of G-protein.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2005

Phototransduction in primate cones and blowfly photoreceptors: different mechanisms, different algorithms, similar response.

Phototransduction in primate cones is compared with phototransduction in blowfly photoreceptor cells. Phototransduction in the two cell types utilizes not only different molecular mechanisms, but also different signal processing steps, producing range compression, contrast constancy, and an intensity-dependent integration time. The dominant processing step in the primate cone is a strongly compressive nonlinearity due to cGMP hydrolysis by phosphodiesterase. In the blowfly photoreceptor a considerable part of the range compression is performed by the nonlinear membrane of the cell. Despite these differences, both photoreceptor cell types are similarly effective in compressing the wide range of naturally occurring intensities, and in converting intensity variations into contrast variations. A direct comparison of the responses to a natural time series of intensities, simulated in the cone and measured in the blowfly photoreceptor, shows that the responses are quite similar.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2005

Extra-retinal adaptation of cortical motion-processing areas during pursuit eye movements.

Repetitive eye movement produces a compelling motion aftereffect (MAE). One mechanism thought to contribute to the illusory movement is an extra-retinal motion signal generated after adaptation. However, extra-retinal signals are also generated during pursuit. They modulate activity within cortical motion-processing area MST, helping transform retinal motion into motion in the world during an eye movement. Given the evidence that MST plays a key role in generating MAE, it may also become indirectly adapted by prolonged pursuit. To differentiate between these two extra-retinal mechanisms we examined storage of the MAE across a period of darkness. In one condition observers were told to stare at a moving pattern, an instruction that induces a more reflexive type of eye movement. In another they were told to deliberately pursue it. We found equally long MAEs when testing immediately after adaptation but not when the test was delayed by 40 s. In the case of the reflexive eye movement the delay almost completely extinguished the MAE, whereas the illusory motion following pursuit remained intact. This suggests pursuit adapts cortical motion-processing areas whereas unintentional eye movement does not. A second experiment showed that cortical mechanisms cannot be the sole determinant of pursuit-induced MAE. Following oblique pursuit, we found MAE direction changes from oblique to vertical. Perceived MAE direction appears to be influenced by a subcortical mechanism as well, one based on the relative recovery rate of horizontal and vertical eye-movement processes recruited during oblique pursuit.

Adaptation, Ocular↗