PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15846446

A basis for electronic cognitive simulation: the heuristic patient.

Abstract

Although medical trainees are expected to become expert quickly and safely, limited electronic methods are available to rehearse medical cognition for common outpatient and non-emergent inpatient problems. We conducted a series of formal observational sessions designed to determine what interaction requirements are desirable for student rehearsal of medical management by using an electronic patient. The studies utilized both manual and electronic methods for a student to evaluate and manage patients with medical and surgical problems. We observed the following major requirements for an effective simulation experience: the user must have a trial-and-error experience with the patient; the user must have unconstrained access to query and treat the patient; anatomic and physiologic values in the patient must change appropriately in response to user actions; and the user must be able to control certain time-related aspects of the simulation. When these requirements are implemented within a simulation, user-directed management of an electronic patient, by itself, becomes a strong aid to learning by trial- and-error techniques. We conclude that the heuristic patient is a practical and useful concept. Once fully developed, it would allow rehearsal of patient care decision making, intrinsically demonstrating trainee knowledge deficits, and resulting in self-directed learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Mallott, John Raczek, Craig Skinner, Kevin Jarrell, Mark Shimko, Bruce Jarrell. 2005. A basis for electronic cognitive simulation: the heuristic patient.. https://doi.org/10.1177/155335060501200107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Surgical residents as medical student mentors.

BACKGROUND: Medical students' decreasing interest in surgery may be caused by the inadequate availability of role models. We believe that surgical residents show the qualities of outstanding surgical mentors and are in a key position to influence students' career choices. METHODS: In 2004-2005, 117 medical students at Mount Sinai School of Medicine completed their third-year surgery clerkship. They were asked to complete an anonymous survey regarding a career in surgery and surgical mentors. RESULTS: A total of 107 students (91%) completed the survey. Seventy-nine percent were influenced positively toward a surgical career after the clerkship. A higher fraction of these students identified a mentor or role model than the students who did not increase their interest in surgery (95% vs 52%). Residents scored higher than attendings in 12 of 14 qualities describing outstanding clinical mentors (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Role models are crucial in bolstering medical students' interest in surgical careers. Residents are identified as having qualities that are essential to being an outstanding mentor and residents may play a role in influencing students' career choices.

Clinical Clerkship↗

A web-based system for students to document their experiences within six core competency domains during all clinical clerkships.

The authors describe the design and implementation of a new Web-based system that allows students to record important features of their clinical encounters during all 10 required clinical clerkships, document their learning experiences in six major competency domains, and generate detailed real-time reports for themselves and their clerkship directors. A new Web-based system, DMEDS (Dartmouth Medical Encounter Documentation System), accepts input from computers and PDAs. Its design permits students to describe their patients, learning sites, interactions with preceptors, and important aspects of their clinical encounters in all of our medical school's competency domains. Using a common format for all required clerkships, clerkship directors select specific items most relevant to their clerkships from a common menu and set learning targets for specific diagnoses and clinical skills. This new system was designed in the fall of 2003, tested in the spring of 2004, and implemented in all clerkships for the 2004 to 2005 academic year. During the first full academic year that DMEDS was used, students documented nearly 32,000 discrete student-patient-preceptor encounters, an average of between 21 and 120 clinical encounters per Year 3 clerkship. Highlights of the analysis of these initial data include the following: (1) insights into how educational targets are set, (2) the extent of site-to-site variation in clerkship experiences, (3) the epidemiology of patients' declining student involvement, and (4) student experiences in and understanding of the newer competency domains.DMEDS can be used in all clinical clerkships and can address student experiences in all competency domains. It provides substantial value to students, clerkship directors, preceptors, and medical school administrators. As secondary benefits, the authors found that DMEDS facilitates educational research and is readily adapted for use in residency and fellowship programs as well. Student feedback highlights the need to pay close attention to the time invested by students documenting their clinical encounters. Course directors must ensure that the benefits to students (such as knowledge of meeting learning targets and preceptors providing direct feedback to students) are transparent. Finally, for other schools contemplating the change to a competency-based curriculum with the use of a clinical encounter documentation system, the time required for both students and faculty to adopt and fully engage these major educational culture shifts seems to be at least several years.

Clinical Clerkship↗