PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15853267

Gene ontology application to genomic functional annotation, statistical analysis and knowledge mining.

Abstract

While a massive amount of biomolecular information is increasingly accumulating in different databanks, on the other hand high-throughput technologies are generating a great quantity of data that need to be annotated with the genomic information available, and interpreted. To this aim, the use of specific ontologies can greatly help either in integrating different information stored within heterogeneous databanks, or in identifying and clustering sequence data sharing common characteristics. In the molecular biology domain, the Gene Ontology (GO) is the most developed and widely used ontology. To demonstrate its great utility in the annotation and biological interpretation of gene sets obtained by means of high-throughput experiments, we implemented the web application here described. It enables functional annotations of a given gene set on a genomic scale and across different species. Within our application the annotations provided by the GO vocabulary allow either to easily bind several information from different resources, or to cluster annotated genes according to their biological characteristics. Through the GO structure it is also possible to represent biological concepts with different specificity levels, from very general to very precise concepts. Furthermore, the statistical evaluation of the categorizations provided by the GO annotations enables to highlight the most significant biological characteristics of a gene set, and therefore to mine knowledge from data. Our created tool meets the need to manage a vast quantity of biological data with a simple user interface adapt also for users with limited informatics knowledge, leading them to evaluate the functional significance of experiment's results with graphical views and statistical indexes in a well-known web browser user interface.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dario Martucci, Marco Masseroli, Francesco Pinciroli. 2004. Gene ontology application to genomic functional annotation, statistical analysis and knowledge mining.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15853267/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

By comparing the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei KL1 and BK56 strains on yogurt quality, the optimal consumption time for 2 compound fermented yogurts was determined.

This study investigated the effects of 2 Lactobacillus paracasei strains, KL1 and BK56, on the physicochemical properties, microstructure, texture characteristics, and sensory quality of a compound fermented yogurt system (GK107: L. paracasei KL1, Leuconostoc mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture; G56107: L. paracasei BK56, L. mesenteroides G12S, Chr. Hansen Commercial Starter Culture), and further integrated genomic and metabolomic analyses to infer their shelf-life and optimal consumption period. The results showed that GK107 yogurt maintained stable quality throughout the 28-d storage period (at d 28: pH 4.07; titratable acidity 93.25 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 53.05%; sensory score 83), and rapidly formed a stable gel structure that persisted for an extended duration. In contrast, the quality of G56107 yogurt deteriorated during the later stage of storage (at d 28: pH 4.0; titratable acidity 98.4 °T; exopolysaccharide content 0.31 g/L; water-holding capacity 51.3%; sensory score 67). Genomic analysis revealed that, compared with the L. paracasei KL1 strain, the L. paracasei BK56 strain carried loss-of-function mutations in multiple key genes associated with flavor synthesis, polysaccharide metabolism, and proteolysis, including alsS, prtP, glpO, AWC33_RS01450, AWC33_RS00855, AWC33_RS01070, and AWC33_RS01805. These mutations may have played a role in the gradual flavor deterioration, and weak post-acidification control observed in G56107 yogurt during prolonged storage. Based on the above results, it is reasonable to suggest that GK107 yogurt is suitable for long-term storage with an optimal consumption period of 14 to 28 d, whereas G56107 yogurt is more suitable for short-term storage and recommended for consumption within the first 14 d.

Genomics↗

Jingjing Zhai and Edward S. Buckler.

Dr. Laura Zahn asked the authors, Dr. Jingjing Zhai and Dr. Edward (Ed) S. Buckler, to tell us about their research relating to their Cell Genomics paper, "PlantCAD2: A DNA foundation model for interpreting genomes across flowering plants."

Genomics↗