PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15856937

Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks.

Abstract

In his long years of studying visual perception, Jacob Beck made many contributions. This article is a short review of one line of his research--that we shared in--and then a presentation of some results from on-going research down the same line. In the 1980s Beck and his colleagues introduced a new kind of visual stimulus: element-arrangement texture patterns. A series of studies with these patterns has shown that a model containing spatial-frequency and orientation-selective channels can explain many aspects of texture perception as long as two kinds of nonlinear processes are also included; the published studies are briefly summarized. The new results come from multiple objective tasks requiring the observer to make simple discriminations between second-order element-arrangement textures. Results with the objective tasks replicate previously published results using subjective ratings, and the use of the objective tasks allows us to explore several more fine-grained questions about complex (second-order) channels and normalization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Sabina Wolfson, Norma Graham. 2005. Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks.. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568568053320602

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Short- and long-range spatial interactions: a redefinition.

First level short- and long-range spatial interactions are considered to be processed in the primary visual cortex. In psychophysics, they are measured with two kinds of stimuli, Gabor patches and lines/points. Each has its own short- and long-range definitions. We show that first, in terms of visual angle separation, the two definitions do not correspond to identical scales of interactions and second, that Gabor data can be matched to the lines/points definition by properly considering the observed effects. As a consequence, three regimes of spatial interaction are present: a case where overlapping of stimuli is present, and two others for spatially separated stimuli which we define as the short- and long-range regimes. Both types of stimuli show compatible lateral interactions and, we think, permit the measurement of the same underlying mechanisms.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays.

Upright images of faces appear more salient than faces of other orientations. We exploited this effect in a titration experiment where faces were superimposed in transparency. By manipulating the physical contrast of the component images, we measured the degree of perceptual dominance as function of the orientation of the face in the image plane. From these measurements, we obtain the orientation tuning of face processing, which is well approximated by a Gaussian function with a SD of about 45 deg and mean centered on upright. Faces predominantly lit from above and from below produced very similar results. However, when presented with scrambled faces observers showed no orientation preference. We argue that these results can be explained by the existence of specialized face processing mechanisms with an orientation tuning with a bandwidth of approximately 90 deg, predominantly centered on the upright orientation and easily disrupted by alterations of the normal facial configuration.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Second-order motion shifts perceived position.

Many studies have documented that first-order motion influences perceived position. Here, we show that second-order (contrast defined) motion influences the perceived positions of stationary objects as well. We used a Gabor pattern as our second-order stimulus, which consisted of a drifting sinusoidal contrast modulation of a dynamic random-dot background; this second-order carrier was enveloped by a static Gaussian contrast modulation. Two vertically aligned Gabors had carrier motion in opposite directions. Subjects judged the relative positions of the Gabors' static envelopes. The positions of the Gabors appeared shifted in the direction of the carrier motion, but the effect was narrowly tuned to low temporal frequencies across all tested spatial frequencies. In contrast, first-order (luminance defined) motion shifted perceived positions across a wide range of temporal frequencies, and this differential tuning could not be explained by differences in the visibility of the patterns. The results show that second-order motion detection mechanisms contribute to perceived position. Further, the differential spatial and temporal tuning of the illusion supports the idea that there are distinct position assignment mechanisms for first and second-order motion.

Contrast Sensitivity↗