Structural basis for nuclear import complex dissociation by RanGTP.

Soo Jae Lee; Yoshiyuki Matsuura; Sai Man Liu; Murray Stewart

doi:10.1038/nature03578

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15864302

Structural basis for nuclear import complex dissociation by RanGTP.

Soo Jae Lee·Yoshiyuki Matsuura·Sai Man Liu·Murray Stewart

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Nuclear protein import is mediated mainly by the transport factor importin-beta that binds cytoplasmic cargo, most often via the importin-alpha adaptor, and then transports it through nuclear pore complexes. This active transport is driven by disassembly of the import complex by nuclear RanGTP. The switch I and II loops of Ran change conformation with nucleotide state, and regulate its interactions with nuclear trafficking components. Importin-beta consists of 19 HEAT repeats that are based on a pair of antiparallel alpha-helices (referred to as the A- and B-helices). The HEAT repeats stack to yield two C-shaped arches, linked together to form a helicoidal molecule that has considerable conformational flexibility. Here we present the structure of full-length yeast importin-beta (Kap95p or karyopherin-beta) complexed with RanGTP, which provides a basis for understanding the crucial cargo-release step of nuclear import. We identify a key interaction site where the RanGTP switch I loop binds to the carboxy-terminal arch of Kap95p. This interaction produces a change in helicoidal pitch that locks Kap95p in a conformation that cannot bind importin-alpha or cargo. We suggest an allosteric mechanism for nuclear import complex disassembly by RanGTP.

Explore related subjects

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus Allosteric Regulation Binding Sites Crystallography, X-Ray Models, Molecular Multiprotein Complexes Mutation Protein Conformation Saccharomyces cerevisiae Structure-Activity Relationship beta Karyopherins ran GTP-Binding Protein Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Soo Jae Lee, Yoshiyuki Matsuura, Sai Man Liu, Murray Stewart. 2005-05-01. Structural basis for nuclear import complex dissociation by RanGTP.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Nuclear localization of liver X receptor alpha and beta is differentially regulated.

Activity of nuclear receptors is regulated by their nuclear localization. Liver X receptors (LXR) alpha and beta are nuclear receptors that regulate transcription of genes for cholesterol metabolism, cholesterol transport, and lipogenesis. While LXR alpha and beta are very similar in structure and exhibit similar ligand binding properties, their physiological roles are quite different. Since the LXRs fall into a class of receptors that move between the nucleus and cytoplasm, experiments were conducted to determine whether LXR alpha and LXR beta show differences in their nuclear localization pattern. To determine the location of each receptor, cell lines stably expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) chimeras with either LXR alpha or LXR beta were examined. Retention in the nucleus of the chimeric proteins in the presence or absence of ligands was assessed using fluorescence microscopy coupled with digitonin permeabilization assays. Surprisingly, differences were found between LXR alpha and LXR beta. Whereas unliganded LXR alpha was retained in the nucleus, unliganded LXR beta was partially exported. Mutations were then introduced into putative nuclear localization sequences (NLS) to determine which sequences are important for nuclear localization and function. Mutation in one such sequence abolished nuclear localization of LXR alpha, whereas the analogous change in LXR beta had a much less dramatic effect. Mutations in analogous putative NLS also differentially affected transcriptional activation by LXR alpha and LXR beta. These data demonstrate for the first time that nuclear retention and localization as well as function of LXR alpha and LXR beta are differentially regulated.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

PubMed2006

Physical and functional interactions between MutY glycosylase homologue (MYH) and checkpoint proteins Rad9-Rad1-Hus1.

The MYH (MutY glycosylase homologue) increases replication fidelity by removing adenines or 2-hydroxyadenine misincorporated opposite GO (7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanine). The 9-1-1 complex (Rad9, Rad1 and Hus1 heterotrimer complex) has been suggested as a DNA damage sensor. Here, we report that hMYH (human MYH) interacts with hHus1 (human Hus1) and hRad1 (human Rad1), but not with hRad9. In addition, interactions between MYH and the 9-1-1 complex, from both the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and human cells, are partially interchangeable. The major Hus1-binding site is localized to residues 295-350 of hMYH and to residues 245-293 of SpMYH (S. pombe MYH). Val315 of hMYH and Ile261 of SpMYH play important roles for their interactions with Hus1. hHus1 protein and the 9-1-1 complex of S. pombe can enhance the glycosylase activity of SpMYH. Moreover, the interaction of hMYH-hHus1 is enhanced following ionizing radiation. A significant fraction of the hMYH nuclear foci co-localizes with hRad9 foci in H2O2-treated cells. These results reveal that the 9-1-1 complex plays a direct role in base excision repair.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

PubMed2006

Interaction of IGF signaling and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer progression.

The insulin-like growth factor type I receptor (IGF-IR) has been suggested to play an important role in prostate cancer progression and possibly in the progression to androgen-independent (AI) disease. The term AI may not be entirely correct, in that recent data suggest that expression of androgen receptor (AR) and androgen-regulated genes is the primary association with prostate cancer progression after hormone ablation. Therefore, signaling through other growth factors has been thought to play a role in AR-mediated prostate cancer progression to AI disease in the absence of androgen ligand. However, existing data on how IGF-IR signaling interacts with AR activation in prostate cancer are conflicting. In this Prospect article, we review some of the published data on the mechanisms of IGF-IR/AR interaction and present new evidence that IGF-IR signaling may modulate AR compartmentation and thus alter AR activity in prostate cancer cells. Inhibition of IGF-IR signaling can result in cytoplasmic AR retention and a significant change in androgen-regulated gene expression. Translocation of AR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus may be associated with IGF-induced dephosphorylation. Since fully humanized antibodies targeting the IGF-IR are now in clinical trials, the current review is intended to reveal the mechanisms of potential therapeutic effects of these antibodies on AI prostate cancers.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗