PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15885576

PSA elevation during prostate cryosurgery and subsequent decline.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the immediate effect of prostate cryosurgery on PSA and the subsequent decline. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PSA level was measured in 14 patients who underwent cryosurgery for prostate cancer. Blood samples were taken immediately before and after cryosurgery and 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. A confidence interval for the elevation from baseline to maximal PSA was calculated. PSA decline was assessed in patients with a nadir PSA < or =0.5 ng/mL. Patients with a postoperative nadir PSA >0.5 ng/mL were considered to harbor viable cancer and were excluded from the decline analysis. The observed PSA levels during the postoperative period were compared with the expected levels that were calculated according to the maximal PSA level and a serum half-life of 2.5 days. Student t-test was used to compare expected and observed PSA levels. RESULTS: PSA increased from an average of 9.23 ng/mL preoperatively to a maximum average of 155 ng/mL (maximal PSA ranges: 18.9-490.5 ng/mL). The 95% CI for the increase in PSA from baseline level was 63.4 to 224.14. PSA nadir < or =0.5 ng/mL was achieved in 10 patients. The observed PSA decline course was slower than expected according to its half-life. Average observed and expected PSA levels at 2,4 and 6 weeks after cryosurgery were 10.4 versus 3.57 ng/mL (P = 0.005), 0.65 versus 0.07 (P = 0.007) and 0.09 versus 0.001 (P = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: PSA levels increase steeply following cryosurgery, and decline slower than expected according to the serum half-life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dan Leibovici, Amnon Zisman, Arie Lindner, Kobi Stav, Yoram I Siegel. PSA elevation during prostate cryosurgery and subsequent decline.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.06.005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The case for routine use of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis for most patients. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, providing the only realistic hope of long-term survival. Even with optimal surgical management, 5-year survival averages 15% to 20% for resectable disease. Progress is being made, however. Currently, the benefits of postoperative therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear clear, and recommendations for such therapy appear to us to be well justified. Additional benefit to patients awaits the development of new agents, molecular targeted drugs, and novel approaches such as immunotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Proposal for a new definition of true cardia carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It remains controversial whether cardia carcinoma should be categorized and treated as esophageal cancer or gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a reasonable definition of cardia carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with Siewert type II carcinomas were divided into two subgroups: 25 patients with a tumor center within 1 cm of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (type IIA) and 22 patients with tumor center 1-2 cm aboral of the EGJ (type IIB). Patients with subcardia carcinomas, 40 with invasion to the EGJ (type III) and 110 without (type IIIe-), were used as controls. RESULTS: The patients with type IIB carcinomas showed no different characteristics from those with type III or type IIIe- carcinomas, except for the stage of the disease. On the other hand, those with type IIA carcinomas were associated with a higher male/female ratio, higher incidences of elevated appearance, differentiated histology, and mediastinal node metastasis, and a significantly lower survival rate as compared with patients with subcardia carcinomas. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that type IIA is a significant prognostic determinant, but that type IIB is not. CONCLUSION: Type IIA carcinomas should be treated as true cardia carcinoma; type IIB as subcardia carcinoma. Our results should be confirmed by a prospective study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Favorable indications for hepatectomy in patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) is dismal. The purpose of this study was to review our recent outcomes of hepatectomy for LMGC and to determine the suitable candidates for surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The outcomes of 37 patients with LMGC who underwent hepatectomy between 1990 and 2005 were assessed. No extrahepatic distant metastasis and feasibility of macroscopic curative resection were requisite indications for surgery. The prognostic values of clinicopathological factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. The median survival time and overall 5-year survival rate after hepatectomy of the patients with LMGC were 31 months and 11%, respectively. Intrahepatic recurrence following hepatectomy was found in 23 patients (62%). Variables independently associated with poor survival were bilobar metastasis (P = 0.002, CI = 1.9-16.3) and a maximum tumor diameter of >or= 4 cm (P = 0.006, CI = 1.4-7.7). The depth of the primary tumor and the timing of metastasis were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for LMGC may be indicated in patients with unilobar metastasis and/or tumors less than 4 cm in diameter. Synchronous metastasis is not a contraindication for hepatectomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗