PubMed · 15890862
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
James W Aldridge. 2005-05-13. Interpreting correlation as causation?. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.308.5724.954
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A prominent theory in neuroscience suggests reward learning is driven by the discrepancy between a subject's expectation of an outcome and the actual outcome itself. Furthermore, it is postulated that midbrain dopamine neurons relay this mismatch to target regions including the ventral striatum. Using functional MRI (fMRI), we tested striatal responses to prediction errors for probabilistic classification learning with purely cognitive feedback. We used a version of the Rescorla-Wagner model to generate prediction errors for each subject and then entered these in a parametric analysis of fMRI activity. Activation in ventral striatum/nucleus-accumbens (Nacc) increased parametrically with prediction error for negative feedback. This result extends recent neuroimaging findings in reward learning by showing that learning with cognitive feedback also depends on the same circuitry and dopaminergic signaling mechanisms.
Until today, morphometric neuroimaging studies on affective disorders concentrate on the limbic system, especially the hippocampus, amygdala, and anterior cingulate. In most of the studies and reviews available today, the basal ganglia are of secondary interest. It seems that the basal ganglia are interest of neurologist, whereas the limbic system is reserved for psychiatric neuroimaging studies. We follow a different approach in this review, studying all available papers on MRI research of the basal ganglia in unipolar depression and bipolar disorder. We found a possibly larger neostriatum in bipolar and possibly smaller one in unipolar patients. None of the unipolar studies found any larger basal ganglion, and only one out of 12 bipolar studies found smaller basal ganglia. Both findings seemed to depend on age (tendency toward smaller volumes in unipolar and bipolar with older age), sex (men tending to pathology in both disorders) and bipolar patients show a possible influence of medication, which is not assessed so far in unipolar depression. We conclude that several methodological shortcomings in volumetric MRI research on the basal ganglia in affective disorders make it necessary to imply more research in this area. We suggest (a) better MRI methods (we do not have a single volumetric 3 Tesla study in this patient group); (b) studies of medication-naïve patients (thus ruling out the medication effect); (c) Studies that directly compare unipolar depressed and bipolar patients are needed to determine whether these apparent differences in morphometric abnormalities, as observed through the mediating comparison with healthy subjects, are real.
The DSM-IV provides two subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), labelled as OCD with insight and OCD with poor insight. For the latter, patients generally fail to recognize that the obsessions or compulsions are excessive or unreasonable. Several studies have shown significant brain abnormalities in OCD patients. However, at present, it remains unclear whether a specific pattern of structural brain abnormalities is related to poor insight in OCD. In the present study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were compared in OCD patients with insight versus those with poor insight. Outpatients with diagnoses of OCD according to DSM-IV (300.30) and ICD-10 (F42) (n = 84; mean age 38+/-13; 35 females, 49 males) were dichotomized into the two subtypes. All subjects underwent an MRI examination. MRI findings were rated as "MRI abnormality" and "normal MRI." In our sample, 48% of the patients had MRI abnormalities. There was a highly significant difference between the two groups according to frequencies of MRI abnormalities, with 83% of the patients with poor insight showing MRI abnormalities compared with only 21% of the patients with insight. The specifier "poor insight" helps to identify a subgroup of OCD with a higher frequency of brain abnormalities of various types. This distinction should be taken into account in future studies concerning the course and therapeutic outcome of OCD.