PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15893576

Feed-forward associative learning for volitional movement control.

Abstract

One of the most difficult problems in motor learning is determining the source of a learning signal, sometimes called an error signal. This problem is hidden in the adaptations of simple reflexive movements by attributing its source to sensory organs. The feed-forward associative motor learning theory proposed here attributes the source to the movement system itself. When a subject performs a corrective movement after his primary movement, the proposed neural learning device learns to associate the primary motor command with the corrective motor command by using a place-coding system. In the subsequent trials, the primary movement will involve a correction due to the participation of this mechanism, thus resulting in better performance. The theory assumes three conditions, namely, that a motor center and the learning device share the same place-encoded motor information; the motor center issues a command and a learning signal simultaneously from the same unit; and a learning signal issued with a corrective command has a heterosynaptic interaction with the previous primary command. The cerebellum is a reasonable candidate for the device satisfying these conditions. The reaction time of a corrective movement, usually 100-300 ms, almost satisfies the coincidence condition for long-term depression of the granule-to-Purkinje synapses. As an application, this theory is demonstrated to account for behavioral results regarding saccadic adaptation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Masahiko Fujita. 2005-03-24. Feed-forward associative learning for volitional movement control.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2005.02.006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Attending to remember and remembering to attend.

Attention and memory are intimately linked. Two functional imaging studies in this issue of Neuron provide novel evidence for this powerful, reciprocal relationship. Turk-Browne and colleagues report that attention simultaneously facilitates the formation of both implicit and explicit memories, while Summerfield and colleagues demonstrate that memory for the past can guide the allocation of attention in the present. Together, these elegant studies reveal bidirectional interactions between attention and memory.

Association Learning↗

The internet as a research tool in the study of associative learning: an example from overshadowing.

The present study aimed to replicate an associative learning effect, overshadowing, both in the traditional laboratory conditions and over the internet. The experimental task required participants to predict an outcome based on the presence of several cues. When a cue that was always trained together with a second cue was presented on isolation at test, the expectancy of the outcome was impaired, which revealed overshadowing. This experimental task was performed by undergraduate students (N=106) in the laboratory and by a different set of anonymous participants over the internet (N=91). Similar levels of overshadowing were obtained in both locations. These similarities show that web-delivered experiments can be used as a complement of traditional experiments.

Association Learning↗

Stronger renewal in human fear conditioning when tested with an acquisition retrieval cue than with an extinction retrieval cue.

It was previously demonstrated in our laboratory that conditioned fear in humans can renew after extinction, when this procedure took place in a different context (ABA-renewal [Vansteenwegen et al. (2005). Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a return to the original acquisition context. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(3), 323-336]). Using the same experimental design, we now tested the power of retrieval cues to interact with this contextual renewal phenomenon. Two groups went through acquisition and extinction (in a different context). They were then tested in the original acquisition context and in the presence of a retrieval cue. In the acquisition-cue group, this cue previously featured during the acquisition procedure; in the extinction-cue group, the cue previously featured during the extinction procedure. As expected, renewal of conditioned electro-dermal responding and retrospective expectancy ratings was strongest in the acquisition-cue group. Theoretical and clinical implications of this finding are discussed.

Association Learning↗