PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15896859

The human Retinal Functional Unit.

Abstract

It has long been known that readers of this page will move their eyes from one fixation to the next two to four times per second. It follows from this fact that each fixation triggers a unique optic nerve volley lasting up to 300 ms that contains all the information the retina processes between fixations. Here we give such volleys a name (Retinal Functional Unit, RFU) and use human subjects and interstimulus interval (ISI) experiments to define some of their properties. We report that RFUs can be dissected into an initial fraction that reaches the cortex and a later fraction that may not, depending on the ISI between successive stimuli. During the dissection process the perceptions of the stimuli change in an orderly way, such that successive thresholds of "twoness", color, and duration are reached as a function of increasing ISI. We conclude that volleys from the tens or hundreds of thousands of active axons contained in every RFU exit the retina in a precisely determined temporal order, and add this conclusion to three others for which we have already published the supporting data. 1) The mammalian retina normally takes about 300 ms to process a visual stimulus. 2) The ca. 300 ms end product, an RFU, contains in neuronal form all the photochemical information acquired during one fixation. 3) These information-rich volleys reach the cortex with little or no change thanks to monosynaptic transfer in the thalamus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert Galambos, Gábor Juhász, Magor Lorincz, Nora Szilágyi. 2005. The human Retinal Functional Unit.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phototransduction in primate cones and blowfly photoreceptors: different mechanisms, different algorithms, similar response.

Phototransduction in primate cones is compared with phototransduction in blowfly photoreceptor cells. Phototransduction in the two cell types utilizes not only different molecular mechanisms, but also different signal processing steps, producing range compression, contrast constancy, and an intensity-dependent integration time. The dominant processing step in the primate cone is a strongly compressive nonlinearity due to cGMP hydrolysis by phosphodiesterase. In the blowfly photoreceptor a considerable part of the range compression is performed by the nonlinear membrane of the cell. Despite these differences, both photoreceptor cell types are similarly effective in compressing the wide range of naturally occurring intensities, and in converting intensity variations into contrast variations. A direct comparison of the responses to a natural time series of intensities, simulated in the cone and measured in the blowfly photoreceptor, shows that the responses are quite similar.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Extra-retinal adaptation of cortical motion-processing areas during pursuit eye movements.

Repetitive eye movement produces a compelling motion aftereffect (MAE). One mechanism thought to contribute to the illusory movement is an extra-retinal motion signal generated after adaptation. However, extra-retinal signals are also generated during pursuit. They modulate activity within cortical motion-processing area MST, helping transform retinal motion into motion in the world during an eye movement. Given the evidence that MST plays a key role in generating MAE, it may also become indirectly adapted by prolonged pursuit. To differentiate between these two extra-retinal mechanisms we examined storage of the MAE across a period of darkness. In one condition observers were told to stare at a moving pattern, an instruction that induces a more reflexive type of eye movement. In another they were told to deliberately pursue it. We found equally long MAEs when testing immediately after adaptation but not when the test was delayed by 40 s. In the case of the reflexive eye movement the delay almost completely extinguished the MAE, whereas the illusory motion following pursuit remained intact. This suggests pursuit adapts cortical motion-processing areas whereas unintentional eye movement does not. A second experiment showed that cortical mechanisms cannot be the sole determinant of pursuit-induced MAE. Following oblique pursuit, we found MAE direction changes from oblique to vertical. Perceived MAE direction appears to be influenced by a subcortical mechanism as well, one based on the relative recovery rate of horizontal and vertical eye-movement processes recruited during oblique pursuit.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Recovery of rod-mediated a-wave during light-adaptation in mGluR6-deficient mice.

The purpose of this study was to compare the a-waves of mGluR6-deficient mice (KO) to that of wild-type mice (WT), and to determine whether the light-adapted electroretinogram of the KO mice originate exclusively from cones. Dark-adapted a-waves were recorded under the same conditions from both types of mice. With a 96-cd/m(2) background, the a-wave from both types of mice showed a rapid recovery over a 50-min period. The analysis of the a-waves in KO mice indicated that the recovery was determined mainly by the rod component. The light-adapted b-wave of WT mice showed no corresponding recovery. We conclude that rod contribution must be considered in the analyses of the light-adapted a-waves of KO mice.

Adaptation, Ocular↗