PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15897486

Interactive multimedia for promoting physical activity (IMPACT) in children.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the efficacy of a computer-based interactive multimedia curriculum for promoting physical activity in fourth grade children. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The participants were 209 fourth grade children (mean age of 9.5 +/- 0.4 years) from four schools. Two schools received an 8-week multimedia intervention delivered by interactive CD-ROM, supplemented by four classroom and four homework assignments. Two control schools received educational CD-ROMS not related to health outcomes. Measures conducted before and after intervention included height, weight, percentage body fat (bioimpedance analysis), physical activity (5-day accelerometry), and psychosocial aspects of physical activity by questionnaire. All outcomes were examined using general linear models. RESULTS: There was a significant treatment effect for obesity reduction in girls but not in boys. There were no significant treatment effects on total physical activity by accelerometry (total counts per minute), but there was an overall treatment effect on reducing percent of time in moderate-intensity activity (16.5% to 15% of the time) and significant sex-by- treatment interactions for light-intensity activities (reduction in boys from 78% to 75% of the time and an increase in girls from 78% to 81% of the time). There were marginal/significant treatment effects for improvements in behavioral outcomes, including self-efficacy (p = 0.06), social norms (p = 0.07), and outcome expectancies (p = 0.049). DISCUSSION: The interactive multimedia curriculum favored an improvement in obesity indices in girls and was associated with subtle changes in physical activity in girls and general improvement in psychosocial outcomes related to physical activity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael I Goran, Kim Reynolds. 2005. Interactive multimedia for promoting physical activity (IMPACT) in children.. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.86

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Two years of growth hormone therapy in young children with Prader-Willi syndrome: physical and neurodevelopmental benefits.

Infants with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) typically display failure to thrive and decreased muscle mass with excess body fat for age. Growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with PWS improves, but does not normalize, body composition and muscle strength and agility. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of earlier GH therapy on anthropometric measurements, body composition, and psychomotor development in affected PWS infants and toddlers. Twenty-five subjects, ages 4-37 months, were randomized to 2 years of GH therapy (1 mg/m(2)/day) or 1 year of observation without GH treatment and then placed on GH (1.5 mg/m(2).day) for 1 year only. Anthropometric measurements were obtained by standard methods: percent body fat, lean body mass, and total body bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry; motor constructs of mobility and stability by the Toddler Infant Motor Evaluation; and cognitive and language function by the Capute Scales of Infant Language and Cognitive Development. GH-treated PWS subjects demonstrated normalization of length/height standard deviation scores (SDS), faster head growth, increased lean body mass accrual, and decreased percent body fat (P < 0.005 for all parameters), as well as improved language (P = 0.05) and cognitive (P = 0.02) quotient Z-scores compared with similarly aged untreated PWS subjects after 1 year into the study. PWS subjects treated before their first birthday spoke their first words at a mean age of 14.4 +/- 2.8 months and walked independently at 23.3 +/- 4.8 months. GH therapy was well-tolerated; however, one PWS subject experienced scoliosis progression. As greater benefits were seen in our study with early treatment, prompt referral to a pediatric endocrinologist for consideration of GH therapy is recommended for PWS at an early age.

Body Composition↗

Effect of plant sterols and exercise training on cholesterol absorption and synthesis in previously sedentary hypercholesterolemic subjects.

Plant sterols combined with exercise beneficially alter lipid profiles in hypercholesterolemic adults. Although the mechanism by which plant sterols favorably modulate lipid levels is well established, no trial to date has examined the effect of exercise, alone or combined with plant sterols, on cholesterol kinetics. Thus, the current objective was to examine the effects of exercise, plant sterols, and the combination of exercise and plant sterols on cholesterol absorption and synthesis. In an 8-week, parallel-arm trial, 84 subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 interventions: plant sterols combined with exercise, plant sterols, exercise, or control. Diets were not controlled. Total cholesterol and triglyceride levels decreased (P<0.01) by 7.7% and 11.8%, respectively, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased (P<0.01) by 7.5% in the combination group. Mean posttreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels decreased (P<0.01) by 0.30 mmol/L in the combination group. Cholesterol absorption was 16% lower (P<0.01) in the combination group and 18% lower (P<0.01) in the plant sterol group, when compared with control. Exercise had no effect on cholesterol absorption. Nonsignificant increases in cholesterol synthesis rates of 63% (0.084+/-0.014 pools/day), 59% (0.075+/-0.013 pools/day), and 57% (0.072+/-0.011 pools/day) were observed in the combination, exercise, and plant sterol groups, respectively, relative to the control group (0.031+/-0.019 pools/day). LDL cholesterol levels correlated with cholesterol absorption, as represented by the area under the deuterium enrichment curve (r=0.23, P=0.05), and with percent absorption relative to control (r=0.25, P=0.03). These findings suggest that exercise does not modulate lipid levels by altering to cholesterol absorption or synthesis, whereas plant sterols favorably alter levels of LDL cholesterol by suppressing intestinal absorption.

Body Composition↗