PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15902816

Pediatric aortic disruption.

Abstract

Although trauma is the primary cause of death in children, few reports or series exist regarding the management of traumatic aortic disruption in the pediatric age group. The clinical outcome in children diagnosed with acute aortic disruption may be directly influenced by diagnostic and therapeutic management decisions. We reviewed the clinical course of 3 consecutive pediatric patients (mean age, 10.0 years; range, 4-16 years) admitted to our institution from January 2002 through May 2003 with the diagnosis of acute aortic disruption due to blunt trauma. In each case, the cause was a motor vehicle accident. Major, concomitant injuries involving other organ systems were present in each patient. Our operative goals were to use primary repair techniques, avoid the use of endovascular stent grafts, and use partial left heart bypass during aortic cross-clamping whenever possible. Each patient underwent successful operative repair. Aortic reconstruction techniques included primary suture repair in the 4-year-old patient, patch angioplasty in the 16-year-old, and placement of an interposition conduit in the 10-year-old for a blow-out type aortic injury. All patients received partial left heart bypass during aortic cross-clamping (mean, 36.6 min; range, 27-50 min), via a centrifugal pump, and anticoagulation. All patients recovered without evidence of adverse neurologic sequelae. Operative repair of acute aortic disruption in pediatric patients using circulatory support can provide good outcomes. Although not always feasible, the preferential use of primary aortic repair techniques in lieu of interposition conduits and endovascular aortic stents may decrease the potential for late pseudocoarctation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas J Takach, Mark P Anstadt, H Victor Moore. 2005. Pediatric aortic disruption.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15902816/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Demographic and clinical characteristics of motor vehicle accident victims in the community general health outpatient clinic: a comparison of PTSD and non-PTSD subjects.

Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) are the leading cause of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the general population, often with enduring symptomatology. This study details epidemiological and clinical features that characterize PTSD among MVA victims living in a nonhospitalized community setting long after the MVA event, and includes exploration of premorbid and peritraumatic factors. MVA victims (n=60; 23 males, 37 females) identified from the registry of a community general health outpatient clinic during a 7-year period were administered an extensive structured battery of epidemiological, diagnostic and clinical ratings. Results indicated that 30 subjects (50%; 12 males, 18 females) had MVA-related PTSD (MVAR-PTSD). Among those with PTSD, 16 individuals exhibited PTSD in partial remission, and six, in full remission. There were no significant demographic or occupational function differences between PTSD and non-PTSD groups. The most common comorbid conditions with MVAR-PTSD were social phobia (20%), generalized anxiety disorder (7.8%) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (0.5%). Previous MVA's were not predictive of PTSD. Subjects with MVAR-PTSD scored worse on the Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale, Part 2 (CAPS-2), Impact of Event Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Impulsivity Scale, and Toronto Alexithymia Rating Scale. Study observations indicate a relatively high rate of PTSD following an MVA in a community-based sample. The relatively high rate of partially remitted MVAR-PTSD (N=16) underscores the importance of subsyndromal forms of illness. Alexithymia may be an adaptive method of coping with event stress. The development of PTSD appears not to be associated with the severity of MVA-related physical injury.

Accidents, Traffic↗

[Determinants of severely injured patients' trust in their hospital physicians].

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown negative effects of insufficient physician-patient interaction leading to a lack of compliance, worse subjective and objective evaluation of treatment outcome, increased consumption of pain medication, and decreased patient satisfaction. The aim of the present study was to identify patient-, physician-, and/or hospital-specific determinants which have a significant influence on the trust of severely injured patients in their physicians. METHODS: A written questionnaire was sent to 121 severely injured patients hurt predominantly in traffic accidents and treated between July 1996 and July 2001 in two departments of surgery in the German state of Northrhine-Westfalia. Applying the Total Design Method, a response rate of 74.4% (n=90) could be achieved. RESULTS: Using univariate analysis as a preselection tool, we developed a logistic regression model which identified four significant predictors of patients' trust in their physicians: (1) patient evaluation of information, (2) patient evaluation of their physician's decision policy, (3) patient evaluation of treatment success, and (4) patient age. CONCLUSIONS: Besides age of patient and subjective evaluation of treatment success, it is psychosocial aspects of interaction which influence trust in a physician. The results of this analysis confirm the importance of physician-patient communication for medical education, also for surgeons.

Accidents, Traffic↗