PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1590578

[The modified Magill forceps].

C Ehrensperger·J Gross·V Hempel·A Henn-Beilharz·A Rau
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Magill forceps are used for nasotracheal intubation, endotracheal suctioning, passing gastric tubes, placement of tampons in the nasopharynx and extraction of foreign material from the pharynx. There are several disadvantages of the standard Magill forceps; however: the danger of cuff perforation, the necessity of readjusting the forceps when placing a tube or catheter, and the risk of injury to the mucous membrane. For these reasons the standard Magill forceps have been modified: the jaws of the forceps have been changed to give curved atraumatic parts without any serrations or sharp edges. RESULTS. The resulting benefits are as follows: Reduced risk of injuring the mucous membrane and perforating the cuff. Tubes and catheter are safely guided between the semiround jaws, making it unnecessary to open the forceps repeatedly to advance the tube. Tampons being placed in the throat no longer get caught between the serrations, and even small foreign objects can easily be extracted from the pharynx.

Explore related subjects

AnesthesiologyEquipment DesignHumansEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Ehrensperger, J Gross, V Hempel, A Henn-Beilharz, A Rau. 1992. [The modified Magill forceps].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1590578/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗